Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33327945›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

On tower and checkerboard neural network architectures for gene expression inference.

Vladimír Kunc, Jiří Kléma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vladimír KuncDepartment of Computer Science, Karlovo náměstí 13, Prague, 121 35, Czech Republic. kuncvlad@fel.cvut.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-4384
Jiří KlémaDepartment of Computer Science, Karlovo náměstí 13, Prague, 121 35, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne possible approach how to economically facilitate gene expression profiling is to use the L1000 platform which measures the expression of ∼1,000 landmark genes and uses a computational method to infer the expression of another ∼10,000 genes. One such method for the gene expression inference is a D-GEX which employs neural networks.

resultsWe propose two novel D-GEX architectures that significantly improve the quality of the inference by increasing the capacity of a network without any increase in the number of trained parameters. The architectures partition the network into individual towers. Our best proposed architecture - a checkerboard architecture with a skip connection and five towers - together with minor changes in the training protocol improves the average mean absolute error of the inference from 0.134 to 0.128.

conclusionsOur proposed approach increases the gene expression inference accuracy without increasing the number of weights of the model and thus without increasing the memory footprint of the model that is limiting its usage.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsGene ExpressionGene Regulatory NetworksCheckerboard architectureGene expressionNeural networkTower architecture

Identifiers

PMID33327945
PMCPMC7739475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.