Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33327711›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2022

Baseline SUVmax is related to tumor cell proliferation and patient outcome in follicular lymphoma.

Cédric Rossi, Marie Tosolini, Pauline Gravelle, Sarah Pericart, Salim Kanoun, Solene Evrard, Julia Gilhodes, Don-Marc Franchini, Nadia Amara, Charlotte Syrykh and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BMC medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Cédric RossiCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence TOUCAN, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; CALYM Carnot Institute, Pierre-Bénite, France; CHU Dijon, Hématologie clinique, Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon. cedric.rossi@inserm.fr.
Marie TosoliniCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; Département de pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Pôle Technologique du Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Pauline GravelleCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence TOUCAN, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; CALYM Carnot Institute, Pierre-Bénite, France; Département de pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Sarah PericartCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Département de pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Salim KanounMédecine Nucléaire, Institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse.
Solene EvrardDépartement de pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Julia GilhodesBureau des essais cliniques, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse.
Don-Marc FranchiniCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence TOUCAN, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; CALYM Carnot Institute, Pierre-Bénite.
Nadia AmaraDépartement de pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Charlotte SyrykhDépartement de pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Réseau Régional de Cancérologie, Onco-Occitanie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole; Service d'Hématologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Pierre BoriesRéseau Régional de Cancérologie, Onco-Occitanie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole; Service d'Hématologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Lucie ObericService d'Hématologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Loïc YsebaertCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence TOUCAN, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; CALYM Carnot Institute, Pierre-Bénite, France.; Service d'Hématologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Laurent MartinDépartement de pathologie, CHU Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231 UFR Bourgogne.
Selim RamlaDépartement de pathologie, CHU Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231 UFR Bourgogne.
Philippine RobertCHU Dijon, Hématologie clinique, Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231 UFR Bourgogne.
Claire Tabouret-ViaudDépartement de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon.
René-Olivier CasasnovasCHU Dijon, Hématologie clinique, Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231 UFR Bourgogne.
Jean-Jacques FourniéCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence TOUCAN, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; CALYM Carnot Institute, Pierre-Bénite.
Christine BezombesCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence TOUCAN, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; CALYM Carnot Institute, Pierre-Bénite. christine.bezombes@inserm.fr.
Camille LaurentCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse III: Paul-Sabatier, ERL5294 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence TOUCAN, Toulouse, France; Programme Hospitalo-Universitaire en Cancérologie CAPTOR, Toulouse, France; CALYM Carnot Institute, Pierre-Bénite, France; Département de pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse. laurent.camille@iuct-oncopole.fr.
Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRHôpital Lyon Sud · FRInserm · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse · FRCentre de recherche Translationnelle en Médecine moléculaire · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma. Despite the clear benefit of CD20-based therapy, a subset of FL patients still progress to aggressive lymphoma. Thus, identifying early biomarkers that incorporate PET metrics could be helpful to identify patients with a high risk of treatment failure with Rituximab. We retrospectively included a total of 132 untreated FL patients separated into training and validation cohorts. Optimal threshold of baseline SUVmax was first determined in the training cohort (n=48) to predict progression-free survival (PFS). The PET results were investigated along with the tumor and immune microenvironment, which were determined by immunochemistry and transcriptome studies involving gene set enrichment analyses and immune cell deconvolution, together with the tumor mutation profile. We report that baseline SUVmax >14.5 was associated with poorer PFS than baseline SUVmax ≤14.5 (HR=0.28; p=0.00046). Neither immune T-cell infiltration nor immune checkpoint expression were associated with baseline PET metrics. By contrast, FL samples with Ki-67 staining ≥10% showed enrichment of cell cycle/DNA genes (p=0.013) and significantly higher SUVmax values (p=0.007). Despite similar oncogenic pathway alterations in both SUVmax groups of FL samples, 4 out of 5 cases harboring the infrequent FOXO1 transcription factor mutation were seen in FL patients with SUVmax >14.5. Thus, high baseline SUVmax reflects FL tumor proliferation and, together with Ki-67 proliferative index, can be used to identify patients at risk of early relapse with R-chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, FollicularLymphoma, Non-HodgkinCell ProliferationHumansRetrospective StudiesRituximabTumor MicroenvironmentRituximab

Identifiers

PMID33327711
PMCPMC8719066
OpenAlexW3113144984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.