Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33327613›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

What's in a Meow? A Study on Human Classification and Interpretation of Domestic Cat Vocalizations.

Emanuela Prato-Previde, Simona Cannas, Clara Palestrini, Sara Ingraffia, Monica Battini, Luca Andrea Ludovico, Stavros Ntalampiras, Giorgio Presti, Silvana Mattiello

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Listen to Us: Perceptions of Animal Voice and Agency.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Crocodile perception of distress in hominid baby cries.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Multimodal Communication in the Human-Cat Relationship: A Pilot Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emanuela Prato-PrevideDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8425-1939
Simona CannasDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5665-7971
Clara PalestriniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5178-906X
Sara IngraffiaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Monica BattiniDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-7759
Luca Andrea LudovicoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-2231
Stavros NtalampirasDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3482-9215
Giorgio PrestiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-9915
Silvana MattielloDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1885-949X
University of Milan · IT

Funding

University of Milan, Italy Linea 2-Mattiello
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the domestic cat (

Indexed as

cat–human communicationdomestic catempathyFelis catusmeowquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID33327613
PMCPMC7765146
OpenAlexW3110727878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.