Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33327447›Full record

ArticleViruses2020

Characterization and Diversity of 243 Complete Human Papillomavirus Genomes in Cervical Swabs Using Next Generation Sequencing.

Ardashel Latsuzbaia, Anke Wienecke-Baldacchino, Jessica Tapp, Marc Arbyn, Irma Karabegović, Zigui Chen, Marc Fischer, Friedrich Mühlschlegel, Steven Weyers, Pascale Pesch and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monogenic etiologies of persistent human papillomavirus infections: A comprehensive systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ardashel LatsuzbaiaEpidemiology and Microbial Genomics, Laboratoire National de Santé, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Anke Wienecke-BaldacchinoEpidemiology and Microbial Genomics, Laboratoire National de Santé, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-3687-9091
Jessica TappEpidemiology and Microbial Genomics, Laboratoire National de Santé, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Marc ArbynUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Irma KarabegovićEpidemiology and Microbial Genomics, Laboratoire National de Santé, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Zigui ChenDepartment of Microbiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8577-1298
Marc FischerDepartment of Medicine, Laboratoire National de Santé, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Friedrich MühlschlegelLaboratoire National de Santé, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Steven WeyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Pascale PeschPlanning Familial, L-1531 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Joël MossongEpidemiology and Microbial Genomics, Laboratoire National de Santé, L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-9835
Laboratoire National de Santé · LUChinese University of Hong Kong · HKGhent University Hospital · BESciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) technology has been widely used for the discovery of novel human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, variant characterization and genotyping. Here, we compared the analytical performance of NGS with a commercial PCR-based assay (Anyplex II HPV28) in cervical samples of 744 women. Overall, HPV positivity was 50.2% by the Anyplex and 45.5% by the NGS. With the NGS, we detected 25 genotypes covered by Anyplex and 41 additional genotypes. Agreement between the two methods for HPV positivity was 80.8% (kappa = 0.616) and 84.8% (kappa = 0.652) for 28 HPV genotypes and 14 high-risk genotypes, respectively. We recovered and characterized 243 complete HPV genomes from 153 samples spanning 40 different genotypes. According to phylogenetic analysis and pairwise distance, we identified novel lineages and sublineages of four high-risk and 16 low-risk genotypes. In total, 17 novel lineages and 14 novel sublineages were proposed, including novel lineages of HPV45, HPV52, HPV66 and a novel sublineage of HPV59. Our study provides important genomic insights on HPV types and lineages, where few complete genomes were publicly available.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralGenomicsAdolescentAdultAlphapapillomavirusCervix UteriComputational BiologyFemaleGenetic VariationGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPapillomavirus InfectionsPhylogenyYoung AdultAnyplex II HPV28cervical cancerhuman papillomavirusnext generation sequencingrolling-circle amplification

Identifiers

PMID33327447
PMCPMC7764970
OpenAlexW3111990137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.