Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33327351›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Assessment of the content, usability, and benefits of the WeChat-based programme for dog bite victims in China: A prospective observation study.

Zhe Du, Wei Huang, Yajun Zhang, Peng Zhang, Zhongdi Liu, Qingjun Chen, Chuanlin Wang

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhe DuTrauma Center, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University People's Hospital.
Wei HuangTrauma Center, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University People's Hospital.
Yajun ZhangTrauma Center, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University People's Hospital.
Peng ZhangTrauma Center, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University People's Hospital.
Zhongdi LiuTrauma Center, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University People's Hospital.
Qingjun ChenDepartment of Emergency, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chuanlin WangTrauma Center, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration, Peking University People's Hospital.ORCID 0000-0003-1828-7153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WeChat in China has been used for public health education and the prevention of diseases. This study introduced a WeChat-based program for rabies prevention and evaluated the users' satisfaction with the program using the technology acceptance model.An online satisfaction questionnaire was used to survey 315 users who had followed the WeChat official account in China, and their satisfaction scores were assessed and analyzed.The users were generally satisfied with the WeChat-based program as an educational and instructional tool with the mean satisfaction score for each item ranging from 3.9 to 4.6 out of a maximum of 5.0 and the total mean satisfaction score of 41.5 out of a maximum of 50.0 (SD = 4.3). Urban users showed more satisfaction than rural users (P = .03). Users who were satisfied also reported that they intended to recommend WeChat to others (P = .00).Findings from the present study indicated that WeChat was considered a useful educational and instructional tool for dog-bite victims among young and urban population. This model of a WeChat-based program for rabies prevention should be expanded to other areas in China.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionSocial MediaAdultAge FactorsAnimalsBites and StingsChinaDogsFemaleHumansMalePatient Education as TopicProspective StudiesRabiesResidence CharacteristicsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33327351
PMCPMC7738026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.