Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33327315›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Adversarial attack on deep learning-based dermatoscopic image recognition systems: Risk of misdiagnosis due to undetectable image perturbations.

Jérôme Allyn, Nicolas Allou, Charles Vidal, Amélie Renou, Cyril Ferdynus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jérôme AllynIntensive care unit.
Nicolas AllouIntensive care unit.
Charles VidalIntensive care unit.
Amélie RenouIntensive care unit.
Cyril FerdynusClinical Informatic Department.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning algorithms have shown excellent performances in the field of medical image recognition, and practical applications have been made in several medical domains. Little is known about the feasibility and impact of an undetectable adversarial attacks, which can disrupt an algorithm by modifying a single pixel of the image to be interpreted. The aim of the study was to test the feasibility and impact of an adversarial attack on the accuracy of a deep learning-based dermatoscopic image recognition system.First, the pre-trained convolutional neural network DenseNet-201 was trained to classify images from the training set into 7 categories. Second, an adversarial neural network was trained to generate undetectable perturbations on images from the test set, to classifying all perturbed images as melanocytic nevi. The perturbed images were classified using the model generated in the first step. This study used the HAM-10000 dataset, an open source image database containing 10,015 dermatoscopic images, which was split into a training set and a test set. The accuracy of the generated classification model was evaluated using images from the test set. The accuracy of the model with and without perturbed images was compared. The ability of 2 observers to detect image perturbations was evaluated, and the inter observer agreement was calculated.The overall accuracy of the classification model dropped from 84% (confidence interval (CI) 95%: 82-86) for unperturbed images to 67% (CI 95%: 65-69) for perturbed images (Mc Nemar test, P < .0001). The fooling ratio reached 100% for all categories of skin lesions. Sensitivity and specificity of the combined observers calculated on a random sample of 50 images were 58.3% (CI 95%: 45.9-70.8) and 42.5% (CI 95%: 27.2-57.8), respectively. The kappa agreement coefficient between the 2 observers was negative at -0.22 (CI 95%: -0.49--0.04).Adversarial attacks on medical image databases can distort interpretation by image recognition algorithms, are easy to make and undetectable by humans. It seems essential to improve our understanding of deep learning-based image recognition systems and to upgrade their security before putting them to practical and daily use.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnostic ErrorsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicHumansModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySkinSkin Diseases

Identifiers

PMID33327315
PMCPMC7738012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.