ArticleMedicine2020
Is nasal septal suturing an alternative technique to nasal packing?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07745127 (Trans Septal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty - A Comparative Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Trans Septal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty - A Comparative Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNasal septal suturing is a commonly used alternative treatment to nasal packing after septoplasty. Besides alleviating postoperative discomfort, extensive studies have shown that nasal septal suturing is more effective than nasal packing. However, its clinical benefits remain controversial.
methodsWe will perform a systematic review of nasal packings effect-related outcome in comparison to nasal septum suture among septoplasty patients by searching 8 databases, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). All eligible studies will be screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers will extract the data. Moreover, Review Manage 5.3 will be used for quality assessment and data analysis. Then, the random effects model or fixed effects model will be applied according to the heterogeneity. In conformity with the GRADE criteria, the merits of the evidence and recommended strength will be assessed.
resultsThis protocol will guide subsequent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The differences in efficacy between nasal septal suturing and nasal packing after septoplasty will be evaluated in terms of efficiency, adverse reaction, comfort degree, and other factors.
conclusionThis proposed study will explore the possibility of adopting nasal septal suturing as an alternative to nasal packing after septoplasty. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER:: doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WF3GX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.