ArticleMedicine2020
The efficacy and safety of acupuncture for patients with post-percutaneous coronary intervention depression: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly applied as an effective revascularization strategy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, recent studies had indicated a higher incidence of depression on post-PCI patients. Acupuncture therapy is effective for depression. However, the treatment effect of depression on post-PCI patients is still not clear. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is planned to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for depression in post-PCI patients.
methodsSix English databases (PubMed, Web of science, Medline, EMBASE, Springer Cochrane Library and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and 4 Chinese databases (Wan fang Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) will be searched normatively according to the rule of each database from the inception to August 1, 2020. Two reviewers will independently conduct article selection, data collection, and risk of bias evaluation. Any disagreement will be resolved by discussion with the third reviewer. Either the fixed-effects or random-effects model will be used for data synthesis based on the heterogeneity test. The change in the scores on the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) and the Self-rating depression scale (SDS) will be used as the main outcome measure. All-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs), rehospitalisation rate and Quality of Life Scale (SF-36) as the secondary outcome. Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS), General physical examination (temperature, pulse, respiration, blood pressure), Routine examination of blood, urine and stool, Electrocardiogram, Liver and kidney function examination as the security indexs. RevMan5.3.5 will be used for meta-analysis.
resultsThis study will provide high-quality evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for depression in post-PCI patients.
conclusionThis systematic review will explore whether acupuncture is an effective and safe intervention for depression in post-PCI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.