ArticlePhysical review. E2020
Electrostatics of charged dielectric spheres with application to biological systems. III. Rigorous ionic screening at the Debye-Hückel level.
Article in Physical review. E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interaction of Nanoparticles in Electrolyte Solutions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Arbitrary-Shape Dielectric Particles Interacting in the Linearized Poisson-Boltzmann Framework: An Analytical Treatment.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Rigorous treatment of pairwise and many-body electrostatic interactions among dielectric spheres at the Debye-Hückel level.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The unequivocal role of electrostatic forces in biological (and colloidal) systems underscores the importance of attaining accurate and rapid calculations of electrostatic forces if one wishes to faithfully simulate the electrostatic aspect of a biological system. This paper makes significant progress toward this aspect as it rigorously incorporates ionic screening at the Debye-Hückel level for an electrolyte system containing dielectric spheres of finite radii. We investigated earlier this system without mobile ions via a surface charge method. However, the need for computing a large number of Wigner rotation matrix elements per configuration can significantly slow down the numerical calculations. This difficulty was recently overcome by our Wigner-matrix-free formalism. Unfortunately, in that method ions can only be included individually, making it impractical to investigate, for example, ionic screening in a system modeled by charged dielectric spheres immersed in a solution of mobile ions. Here, we overcome this difficulty by extending the surface charge method to treat ions implicitly. Previous treatments of charged dielectric spheres in a solution of mobile ions did not emphasize the energy reciprocity of electrostatics and are largely limited to a few spheres and/or special symmetries. Our new formalism respects reciprocity and accommodates arbitrarily many dielectric spheres of different dielectric constants and sizes while being rigorous at the Debye-Hückel level. The differences, and the relationship, between our new implicit ion treatment and our previous ion-free (or explicit ion) approach are described. A closed form for the electrostatic energy with implicit ions is also provided. This new formalism speeds up the computation of the electrostatic energy in the presence of ions, and accommodates permanent and induced multipoles that are very important when the polarization effect needs to be correctly included. We also mention how the proposed method can be transformed to a numerical method for use with arbitrary nonspherical surfaces.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.