Trial reportJournal of gynecologic oncology2021
Phase 2 single-arm study on the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer.
Trial report in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03759600 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Niraparib in Japanese Patients With Advanced, Relapsed, High-grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Who Have Received 3 or 4 Previous Chemotherapy Regimens), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Niraparib in Japanese Patients With Advanced, Relapsed, High-grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Who Have Received 3 or 4 Previous Chemotherapy Regimens
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Trial
- Niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Trial
- Fanconi anemia complementation group C gene (FANCC) association with hereditary and sporadic renal tumors.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Niraparib as maintenance therapy in Japan: a retrospective observational study using a Japanese claims database.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Observational
- DNA Damage Response Alterations in Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities.Cancers · 2023Review
- Targeting Replication Stress Response Pathways to Enhance Genotoxic Chemo- and Radiotherapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Individualization in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer based on the mechanism of action of molecularly targeted drugs.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- How to start niraparib in real-world Asian ovarian cancer patients?Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021Article
- Factors Influencing Severe Hematologic Toxicity Following Niraparib Therapy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer.
methodsThis Phase 2 open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese women with homologous recombination deficiency-positive relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of therapy. The starting dose of niraparib was 300 mg administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or discontinuation. The primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), was assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. Safety evaluations included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious TEAEs.
resultsTwenty women were enrolled and the confirmed ORR in the full analysis set (FAS) was 35.0% (7/20), consisting of 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. Disease control rate in the FAS was 90.0%. The most frequently reported TEAEs (>50%) were anemia, nausea, and platelet count decreased. One patient (5.0%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation of niraparib whereas reductions or interruptions were reported in 14 (70.0%) and 15 (75.0%) patients, respectively. The median dose intensity (202.9 mg daily) corresponded to a relative dose intensity of 67.6%.
conclusionEfficacy and safety of niraparib in heavily pretreated Japanese women was comparable to that seen in an equivalent population of non-Japanese women. No new safety signals were identified.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.