Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326758›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2021

Online sentence processing impairments in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia: Evidence from ERP.

Elena Barbieri, Kaitlyn A Litcofsky, Matthew Walenski, Brianne Chiappetta, Marek-Marsel Mesulam, Cynthia K Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuropathology-specific language features in primary progressive aphasia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dissociating nouns and verbs in temporal and perisylvian networks: Evidence from neurodegenerative diseases.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena BarbieriAphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States. Electronic address: elena.barbieri@northwestern.edu.
Kaitlyn A LitcofskyAphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.
Matthew WalenskiAphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.
Brianne ChiappettaAphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.
Marek-Marsel MesulamMesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Cynthia K ThompsonAphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States; Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

Neuropathology CoreP30AG013854 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ROGALSKI, EMILY J · 1996 to 2020
$28.9M
Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
Language in Primary Progressive AphasiaR01DC008552 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MESULAM, MAREK-MARSEL M · 2007 to 2021
$8.5M
Determinants of neurodegenerative decline in the aphasic variant of Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG056258 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROGALSKI, EMILY J · 2017 to 2022
$4.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013854NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056258NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from psycholinguistic research indicates that sentence processing is impaired in Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA), and more so in individuals with agrammatic (PPA-G) than logopenic (PPA-L) subtypes. Studies have mostly focused on offline sentence production ability, reporting impaired production of verb morphology (e.g., tense, agreement) and verb-argument structure (VAS) in PPA-G, and mixed findings in PPA-L. However, little is known about real-time sentence comprehension in PPA. The present study is the first to compare real-time semantic, morphosyntactic and VAS processing in individuals with PPA (10 with PPA-G and 9 with PPA-L), and in two groups of healthy (22 young and 19 older) individuals, using event-related potentials (ERP). Participants were instructed to listen to sentences that were either well-formed (n = 150) or contained a violation of semantics (e.g., *Owen was mentoring pumpkins at the party, n = 50), morphosyntax (e.g., *The actors was singing in the theatre, n = 50) or VAS (*Ryan was devouring on the couch, n = 50), and were required to perform a sentence acceptability judgment task while EEG was recorded. Results indicated that in the semantic task both healthy and PPA groups showed an N400 response to semantic violations, which was delayed in PPA and older (vs. younger) groups. Morphosyntactic violations elicited a P600 in both groups of healthy individuals and in PPA-L, but not in PPA-G. A similar P600 response was also found only in healthy individuals for VAS violations; whereas, abnormal ERP responses were observed in both PPA groups, with PPA-G showing no evidence of VAS violation detection and PPA-L showing a delayed and abnormally-distributed positive component that was negatively associated with offline sentence comprehension scores. These findings support characterizations of sentence processing impairments in PPA-G, by providing online evidence that VAS and morphosyntactic processing are impaired, in the face of substantially preserved semantic processing. In addition, the results indicate that on-line processing of VAS information may also be impaired in PPA-L, despite their near-normal accuracy on standardized language tests of argument structure production.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveElectroencephalographyComprehensionEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansLanguageMaleSemanticsEvent-related potentialsMorphosyntaxPrimary progressive aphasiaSemanticsSentence processingVerb-argument structure

Identifiers

PMID33326758
PMCPMC7875464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.