Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326506›Full record

ArticleAllergologie select2020

Occupational allergic contact urticaria to tropomyosin from squid.

Daniel Wilfinger, Annette Kuehn, Szandra Takacs, Evgenia Galli-Novak, Barbara Machan, Werner Aberer

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Allergologie select, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel WilfingerDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Occupational Medicine, AUVA Rehabilitation Clinic Tobelbad, Tobelbad, Austria.
Annette KuehnDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxemburg, and.
Szandra TakacsDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Occupational Medicine, AUVA Rehabilitation Clinic Tobelbad, Tobelbad, Austria.
Evgenia Galli-NovakDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Occupational Medicine, AUVA Rehabilitation Clinic Tobelbad, Tobelbad, Austria.
Barbara MachanDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Occupational Medicine, AUVA Rehabilitation Clinic Tobelbad, Tobelbad, Austria.
Werner AbererDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cook's mate working in an Austrian restaurant reported acutely occurring urticarial skin lesions after processing and cooking squid. The prick-to-prick test with squid showed a ++ positive urticarial reaction. Elevated specific IgE antibody levels to squid, shrimp, and house dust mites as well as to tropomyosin from shrimp and house dust mite could be detected in the ImmunoCAP. By means of immunoblot and ELISA, a reaction to squid extract as well as increased IgE antibody levels to squid and tropomyosin from squid could be detected. The patient was diagnosed with a clinically and occupationally relevant type I allergy to squid with cross-reaction to tropomyosin of other invertebrates and therefore recognized as an occupational disease.

Indexed as

contact urticariaIgE antibodyoccupational diseasesquidtropomyosin

Identifiers

PMID33326506
PMCPMC7734873
OpenAlexW3113135116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.