Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326414›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Analysis of Serum Markers with Regard to Treatment Procedures in Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer Patients.

Edyta Wolny-Rokicka, Piotr Petrasz, Wojciech Krajewski, Sylwia Sulimiera Michalak, Andrzej Tukiendorf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edyta Wolny-RokickaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Multidisciplinary Hospital in Gorzów Wielkopolski, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland.
Piotr PetraszDepartment of Urology, Multidisciplinary Hospital in Gorzów Wielkopolski, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland.
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Sylwia Sulimiera MichalakPrimary Medical Care Clinic "Skarbowa", Zielona Góra, Poland.
Andrzej TukiendorfSocial Medicine Department, Medical University in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLUniversity of Zielona Góra · PLWyższa Szkoła Biznesu w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Biomarkers predicting the efficacy of treatment for locally limited prostate cancer are greatly needed. This knowledge could improve the classification of patients for different methods of treatment and enable better recognition of groups with higher risk of biological recurrence. We prospectively assessed serial blood levels of apoptotic biomarkers and correlated them with response to treatment and clinical factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Blood was collected from 25 patients with prostate cancer before and after surgery, 16 healthy volunteers with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and 14 patients with metastasized disease. Immunoenzymatic methods were used to determine circulating apoptotic and inflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), type I receptor (TNFRI), and type II receptor (TNFRII); FAS ligand (FasL); TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRIAL); caspase 8 (Cas8); caspase 9 (Cas9); DNA methylation (metDNA); P-selectin; and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The total circulating fragments of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were measured directly in serum. RESULTS Peripheral serum prostate-specific antigen increased rapidly together with cfDNA. A negative correlation was noted between tumor volume and TNFRI and TNFRII. Postsurgery P-selectin level was decreased, and metDNA and TNFRII levels were increased. Three comparisons were made between patient groups: surgical vs. BPH; surgical vs. palliative; and palliative vs. BPH. TNFRI, TNFRII, metDNA, P-selectin, Cas8, and FasL were shown to have significant roles. CONCLUSIONS The study indicated significant roles for cfDNA, both TNF receptors, metDNA, and P-selectin as serum biomarkers in patients with prostate cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsAgedApoptosisBiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProstatectomyP-SelectinReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type IReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type IIRisk AssessmentBiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsP-SelectinReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type IReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II

Identifiers

PMID33326414
PMCPMC7805249
OpenAlexW3095378631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.