Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326408›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

A Novel Machine Learning Framework for Comparison of Viral COVID-19-Related Sina Weibo and Twitter Posts: Workflow Development and Content Analysis.

Shi Chen, Lina Zhou, Yunya Song, Qian Xu, Ping Wang, Kanlun Wang, Yaorong Ge, Daniel Janies

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shi ChenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2316-111X
Lina ZhouSchool of Business, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1864-0527
Yunya SongDepartment of Journalism, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-5159-1689
Qian XuSchool of Communications, Elon University, Elon, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2354-0208
Ping WangDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Jilin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1859-0710
Kanlun WangSchool of Business, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-7168
Yaorong GeDepartment of Software and Information System, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-0293
Daniel JaniesDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-9906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media plays a critical role in health communications, especially during global health emergencies such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is a lack of a universal analytical framework to extract, quantify, and compare content features in public discourse of emerging health issues on different social media platforms across a broad sociocultural spectrum.

objectiveWe aimed to develop a novel and universal content feature extraction and analytical framework and contrast how content features differ with sociocultural background in discussions of the emerging COVID-19 global health crisis on major social media platforms.

methodsWe sampled the 1000 most shared viral Twitter and Sina Weibo posts regarding COVID-19, developed a comprehensive coding scheme to identify 77 potential features across six major categories (eg, clinical and epidemiological, countermeasures, politics and policy, responses), quantified feature values (0 or 1, indicating whether or not the content feature is mentioned in the post) in each viral post across social media platforms, and performed subsequent comparative analyses. Machine learning dimension reduction and clustering analysis were then applied to harness the power of social media data and provide more unbiased characterization of web-based health communications.

resultsThere were substantially different distributions, prevalence, and associations of content features in public discourse about the COVID-19 pandemic on the two social media platforms. Weibo users were more likely to focus on the disease itself and health aspects, while Twitter users engaged more about policy, politics, and other societal issues.

conclusionsWe extracted a rich set of content features from social media data to accurately characterize public discourse related to COVID-19 in different sociocultural backgrounds. In addition, this universal framework can be adopted to analyze social media discussions of other emerging health issues beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health CommunicationHealth PolicyMachine LearningPoliticsWorkflowCluster AnalysisHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social Mediacommunicationcontent analysiscontent feature extractionCOVID-19cross-cultural comparisonframeworkinfodemiologyinfoveillancemachine learningSina Weibosocial mediaTwitterworkflow

Identifiers

PMID33326408
PMCPMC7790734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.