Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326405›Full record

ReviewJMIR medical informatics2021

Role of Machine Learning Techniques to Tackle the COVID-19 Crisis: Systematic Review.

Hafsa Bareen Syeda, Mahanazuddin Syed, Kevin Wayne Sexton, Shorabuddin Syed, Salma Begum, Farhanuddin Syed, Fred Prior, Feliciano Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AI Quality Standards in Health Care: Rapid Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hafsa Bareen Syeda *Department of Neurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9752-4983
Mahanazuddin Syed *Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-1565
Kevin Wayne SextonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-9867
Shorabuddin SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-5972
Salma BegumDepartment of Information Technology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1466
Farhanuddin SyedCollege of Medicine, Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-6519
Fred PriorDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-5683
Feliciano YuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-9368
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USShadan Hospital and Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19, has caused havoc worldwide, with patients presenting a spectrum of complications that have pushed health care experts to explore new technological solutions and treatment plans. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based technologies have played a substantial role in solving complex problems, and several organizations have been swift to adopt and customize these technologies in response to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the role of AI as a comprehensive and decisive technology to fight the COVID-19 crisis in the fields of epidemiology, diagnosis, and disease progression.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines to identify all potentially relevant studies published and made available online between December 1, 2019, and June 27, 2020. The search syntax was built using keywords specific to COVID-19 and AI.

resultsThe search strategy resulted in 419 articles published and made available online during the aforementioned period. Of these, 130 publications were selected for further analyses. These publications were classified into 3 themes based on AI applications employed to combat the COVID-19 crisis: Computational Epidemiology, Early Detection and Diagnosis, and Disease Progression. Of the 130 studies, 71 (54.6%) focused on predicting the COVID-19 outbreak, the impact of containment policies, and potential drug discoveries, which were classified under the Computational Epidemiology theme. Next, 40 of 130 (30.8%) studies that applied AI techniques to detect COVID-19 by using patients' radiological images or laboratory test results were classified under the Early Detection and Diagnosis theme. Finally, 19 of the 130 studies (14.6%) that focused on predicting disease progression, outcomes (ie, recovery and mortality), length of hospital stay, and number of days spent in the intensive care unit for patients with COVID-19 were classified under the Disease Progression theme.

conclusionsIn this systematic review, we assembled studies in the current COVID-19 literature that utilized AI-based methods to provide insights into different COVID-19 themes. Our findings highlight important variables, data types, and available COVID-19 resources that can assist in facilitating clinical and translational research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecoronavirusCOVID-19deep learningepidemiologymachine learningneural networkpandemicSARS-CoV-2systematic review

Identifiers

PMID33326405
PMCPMC7806275
OpenAlexW3098474649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.