Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326348›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2021

A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Interactive Web-based Tool to Support Surrogate Decision Makers in the Intensive Care Unit.

Angela O Suen, Rachel A Butler, Robert M Arnold, Brad Myers, Holly O Witteman, Christopher E Cox, Jennifer Gonzalez McComb, Praewpannanrai Buddadhumaruk, Anne-Marie Shields, Noah Morse and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Family Support Strategies During Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Angela O SuenDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine.
Rachel A ButlerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, and.ORCID 0000-0001-7024-3575
Robert M ArnoldDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine.
Brad MyersSchool of Computer Science, Human Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Holly O WittemanDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; and.
Christopher E CoxDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer Gonzalez McCombDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Praewpannanrai BuddadhumarukDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, and.
Anne-Marie ShieldsDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, and.
Noah MorseDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, and.
Amanda ArgenasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, and.
Douglas B WhiteDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, and.ORCID 0000-0003-2269-4173
General Department of Preventive Medicine · VNDuke University · USHuman Computer Interaction (Switzerland) · CHUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Improving Surrogate Decision Making for Patients with Advanced Respiratory FailureK24HL148314 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Douglas B White · 2019 to 2026
$944k
Developing a Web and Tablet based Tool to Improve Communication and Shared Decision Making between Clinicians and Surrogates in ICUsR21AG050252 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITE, DOUGLAS B · 2015 to 2016
$423k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148314NIA NIH HHS R21 AG050252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessProfessional-Family RelationsDecision MakingHumansIntensive Care UnitsInternetPilot ProjectsSingle-Blind Methodclinical trialscommunicationcritical caredecision-makinginternet-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID33326348
PMCPMC8328375
OpenAlexW3110900775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.