Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326171›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2021

GSTP1 and ABCB1 Polymorphisms Predicting Toxicities and Clinical Management on Carboplatin and Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer.

Amanda Canato Ferracini, Leisa Lopes-Aguiar, Gustavo Jacob Lourenço, Adriana Yoshida, Carmen Silva Passos Lima, Luis Otávio Sarian, Sophie Derchain, Deanna L Kroetz, Priscila Gava Mazzola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda Canato FerraciniPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Leisa Lopes-AguiarLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Gustavo Jacob LourençoLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Adriana YoshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Carmen Silva Passos LimaLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Luis Otávio SarianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Sophie DerchainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Deanna L KroetzDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Priscila Gava MazzolaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in drug disposition genes might contribute to susceptibility to toxicities and interindividual differences in clinical management on chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This study was designed to explore the association of GST and ABCB1 genetic variation with hematologic and neurologic toxicity, changes in chemotherapy, and disease prognosis in Brazilian women with EOC. A total of 112 women with a confirmed histological diagnosis of EOC treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel were enrolled (2014-2019). The samples were analyzed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the deletion of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. GSTP1 (c.313A>G/rs1695) and ABCB1 (c.1236C>T/rs1128503; c.3435C>T/rs1045642; c.2677G>T>A/rs2032582) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected by real-time PCR. Subjects with the GSTP1 c.313A>G had reduced risk of anemia (odds ratio (OR): 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.69, P = 0.01, dominant model) and for thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.64, P < 0.01; OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03-0.85, P = 0.03, either dominant or recessive model), respectively. The GSTP1 c.313A>G AG genotype was associated with a lower risk of dose delay (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13-0.90, P = 0.03). The ABCB1 c.1236C>T was associated with increased risk of thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.82, P = 0.03), whereas ABCB1 c.3435C>T had increased risk of grade 2 and 3 neurotoxicity (OR: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.08-121.01, P = 0.03) in recessive model (CC + CT vs. TT). This study suggests that GSTP1 c.313A>G, ABCB1 c.1236C>T, and c.3435C>T SNP detection is a potential predictor of hematological toxicity and neurotoxicity and could help predict the clinical management of women with EOC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCarboplatinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlutathione S-Transferase piHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyABCB1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCarboplatinGlutathione S-Transferase piGSTP1 protein, humanPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID33326171
PMCPMC7993324
OpenAlexW3112281288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.