Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33326054›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021

[Proliferative vitreoretinopathy process-To heal or not to heal].

S Grisanti, S Priglinger, L Hattenbach

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S GrisantiKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland. salvatore.grisanti@uksh.de.
S PriglingerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
L HattenbachAugenheilkunde, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEOphthalmology Clinic · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is still an unsolved problem after half a century of research.

methodsThis article provides a review of mechanisms leading to PVR in the context of wound healing research.

resultsWound healing is a physiological repair process that occurs in a similar way in all organs and may end in scar formation. The development of PVR is based on this wound healing mechanism. The localization and structures involved lead to specific characteristics and consequences. Up to now the pharmacotherapeutic strategies were not sufficiently effective. The growing understanding of the mechanisms of scar-free fetal wound healing, could however lead to a solution of the PVR problem.

conclusionThe PVR is a physiological process with a pathological result. The complex steps involved in vitreoretinal wound healing are well understood. There is currently no therapeutic approach neither in ophthalmology nor in other medical disciplines that is able to restore the original function and structure of the involved tissue or organ but there is hope that this can succeed in the future.

Indexed as

Retinal DetachmentVitreoretinopathy, ProliferativeCicatrixHumansCellular transdifferentiationScarTractional retinal detachmentVitreoretinal wound healingWound healing process

Identifiers

PMID33326054
OpenAlexW3111668811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.