Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325831›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2020

Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Low-Carbohydrate Diet Coaching in Adults With Prediabetes: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Olivia Yost, Melissa DeJonckheere, Spring Stonebraker, Grace Ling, Lorraine Buis, Rodica Pop-Busui, Noa Kim, Kara Mizokami-Stout, Caroline Richardson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of barriers and opportunities for care improvement.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Prediabetes: What Are the Best Metrics?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivia Yost *Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-1543
Melissa DeJonckheere *Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-3358
Spring StonebrakerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0277-6801
Grace LingDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3755-5101
Lorraine BuisDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5855-9972
Rodica Pop-BusuiDivision of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-1350
Noa KimDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3033-9641
Kara Mizokami-StoutInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6933-2586
Caroline Richardson *Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1305-4134
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID P OLSON · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is preventable; however, few patients with prediabetes participate in prevention programs. The use of user-friendly continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) with low-carbohydrate diet coaching is a novel strategy to prevent T2DM.

objectiveThis study aims to determine the patient satisfaction and feasibility of an intervention combining CGM use and low-carbohydrate diet coaching in patients with prediabetes to drive dietary behavior change.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods, single-arm pilot and feasibility study at a suburban family medicine clinic. A total of 15 adults with prediabetes with hemoglobin A

resultsThe overall satisfaction rate of our intervention was 93%. The intervention induced a weight reduction of 1.4 lb (P=.02) and a reduction of HbA

conclusionsThe use of CGMs and low-carbohydrate diet coaching to drive dietary changes in patients with prediabetes is feasible and acceptable to patients. This novel method merits further exploration, as the preliminary data indicate that combining CGM use with low-carbohydrate diet coaching drives dietary changes, which may ultimately prevent T2DM.

Indexed as

blood glucose self-monitoringdiet modificationlow carbohydrate dietprediabetesprevention & controltype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID33325831
PMCPMC7773517
OpenAlexW3095236073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.