Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325755›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2020

Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of MCF-7 Cells Exposed to 23 Chemicals at Human-Relevant Levels: Estimation of Individual Chemical Contribution to Effects.

Min Liu, Shenglan Jia, Ting Dong, Fanrong Zhao, Tengfei Xu, Qin Yang, Jicheng Gong, Mingliang Fang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Endocrine-disrupting compounds and metabolomic reprogramming in breast cancer.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. HExpPredict:Environmental health perspectives · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Exposome in human health: Utopia or wonderland?Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Min LiuSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Shenglan JiaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Ting DongSchool of Environment, Jinan University, Guangdong, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Fanrong ZhaoSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Tengfei XuSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Qin YangSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Jicheng GongCollege of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Mingliang FangSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Nanyang Technological University · SGJinan University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumans are constantly being exposed to various xenobiotics at relatively low concentrations. To date, limited evidence is available to ascertain whether a complex xenobiotic mixture at human-relevant levels causes any health effect. Moreover, there is no effective method to pinpoint the contribution of each chemical toward such an effect.

objectivesThis study aims to understand the responses of cells to a mixture containing 23 xenobiotics at human-relevant levels and develop a feasible method to decipher the chemical(s) that contribute significantly to the observed effect.

methodsWe characterized the metabolome and transcriptome of breast cancer cells (MCF-7) before and after exposure to the mixture at human-relevant levels; preexposure levels were derived from existing large-scale biomonitoring data. A high-throughput metabolomics-based "leave-one-out" method was proposed to understand the relative contribution of each component by comparing the metabolome with and without the particular chemical in the mixture.

resultsThe metabolomic analysis suggested that the mixture altered metabolites associated with cell proliferation and oxidative stress. For the transcriptomes, gene ontology terms and pathways including "cell cycle," "cell proliferation," and "cell division" were significantly altered after mixture exposure. The mixture altered genes associated with pathways such as "genotoxicity" and "nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)." Through joint pathways analysis, metabolites and genes were observed to be well-aligned in pyrimidine and purine metabolisms. The leave-one-out results showed that many chemicals made their contributions to specific metabolic pathways. The overall metabolome pattern of the absence of 2,4-dihyroxybenzophenone (DHB) or bisphenol A (BPA) showed great resemblance to controls, suggesting their higher relative contribution to the observed effect. DISCUSSION: The omics results showed that exposure to the mixture at human-relevant levels can induce significant

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsHazardous SubstancesHumansMCF-7 CellsMetabolomeTranscriptomeHazardous Substances

Identifiers

PMID33325755
PMCPMC7741182
OpenAlexW3112665755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.