Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325729›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2021

SHARING Choices: A Pilot Study to Engage Family in Advance Care Planning of Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Impairment in the Primary Care Context.

Jennifer L Wolff, Danny Scerpella, Kimberly Cockey, Naaz Hussain, Tara Funkhouser, Diane Echavarria, Jennifer Aufill, Amy Guo, Danetta H Sloan, Sydney M Dy and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819191 (Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04819191 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients (SHARING Choices)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled64,915ConditionsAdvance Care Planning, DementiaArmsSHARING Choices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L WolffRoger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7898-3903
Danny ScerpellaRoger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kimberly Cockey121577MedStar Health Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health System, Columbia, MD, USA.
Naaz Hussain527470Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tara Funkhouser527470Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Diane EchavarriaRoger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer AufillRoger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amy GuoRoger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Danetta H SloanRoger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sydney M DyRoger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, 25802Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kelly M Smith121577MedStar Health Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health System, Columbia, MD, USA.
SHARING Choices Investigators
Johns Hopkins University · USMedStar Health · USUniversity of Baltimore · US

Funding

Maternal Morbidity and Mortality: Risk Factors, Early Detection and Personalized InterventionUL1TR001409 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GONDRE-LEWIS, MARJORIE C, MELLMAN, THOMAS A · 2015 to 2024
$37.8M
PRAGMATIC TRIAL TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION FOR PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS WITH ADRDR33AG061882 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS, WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2020 to 2022
$3.8M
Pragmatic Trial to Improve Communication for Primary Care Patients with ADRDR61AG061882 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS, WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2018 to 2019
$818k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001409NIA NIH HHS R33 AG061882NIA NIH HHS R61 AG061882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFew advance care planning (ACP) interventions proactively engage family or address the needs of older adults with and without cognitive impairment in the primary care context.

objectivesTo pilot a multicomponent intervention involving: an introductory letter describing a new clinic initiative and inviting patients to complete a patient-family pre-visit agenda-setting checklist, share their electronic health information with family, and talk about their wishes for future care with a trained ACP facilitator (SHARING Choices).

methodsSHARING Choices was delivered to 40 patient-family dyads from 3 primary care clinics. Facilitators completed post-ACP reports. Patient and family participants completed baseline and 6-week surveys.

resultsPatients were on average 75 years (range 65-90). Family were spouses (85.0%) or adult children (15.0%). At 6 weeks, nearly half of dyads participated in ACP conversations (n = 19) or used the agenda-setting checklist (n = 17), one-third (n = 13) registered family to access the patient's portal account, and most (n = 28) provided the primary care team with a new or previously completed advance directive. Of 12 patients who screened positive for cognitive impairment, 9 completed ACP conversations and 10 provided the clinic with an advance directive. ACP engagement, measured on a 4-point scale, was comparatively lower at baseline and 6 weeks among family (3.05 and 3.19) than patients (3.56 and 3.54). Patients remarked that SHARING Choices clarified communication and preferences while family reported a better understanding of their role in ACP and communication.

conclusionSHARING Choices was acceptable among older adults with and without cognitive impairment and may increase advance directive completion.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCognitive DysfunctionAdvance DirectivesAgedHumansPilot ProjectsPrimary Health Careadvance care planningcognitive impairmentfamily caregiverinterventionolder adultsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33325729
PMCPMC8206219
OpenAlexW3112698214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.