Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325648›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Surveillance for radiation-related late effects in childhood cancer survivors: The impact of using volumetric dosimetry.

Sally Cohen-Cutler, Arthur Olch, Kenneth Wong, Jemily Malvar, Richard Sposto, Pierre Kobierski, Amit Sura, Louis S Constine, David R Freyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Radiation-Induced Vascular Disease-A State-of-the-Art Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sally Cohen-CutlerCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3832-6925
Arthur OlchRadiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kenneth WongRadiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jemily MalvarCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard SpostoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pierre KobierskiKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amit SuraKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Louis S ConstineDepartments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
David R FreyerCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-990X
University of Southern California · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation-related screening guidelines for survivors of childhood cancer currently use irradiated regions (IR) to determine risk for late effects. However, contemporary radiotherapy techniques utilize volumetric dosimetry (VD) to determine organ-specific exposures, which could inform need for late effect surveillance.

methodsThis cross-sectional cohort study involved patients treated for cancer using computerized tomography-planned irradiation at Children's Hospital Los Angeles from 2000-2016. Organs at risk were identified using both VD and IR. Under each method, Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines were applied to determine radiation-related potential late effects and their correlative recommended screening practices. Patients served as their own controls. Mean number of potential late effects per patient and recommended screening practices per patient per decade of follow-up were compared using paired t-tests; comparisons were adjusted for diagnosis and gender using random effects, repeated measure linear regression.

resultsIn this cohort (n = 132), median age at end of treatment was 10.6 years (range, 1.4-20.4). Brain tumor was the most common diagnosis (45%) and head/brain the most common irradiated region (61%). Under IR and VD, the mean number of potential late effects flagged was 24.4 and 21.7, respectively (-11.3%, p < 0.001); concordance between the two methods was 6.1%. Under VD, the difference in mean number of recommended screening practices per patient was -7.4% in aggregate but as large as -37.0% for diagnostic imaging and procedures (p < 0.001 for both).

conclusionUse of VD rather than IR is feasible and enhances precision of guideline-based screening for radiation-related late effects in long-term childhood cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAdolescentAdultCancer SurvivorsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleMass ScreeningNeoplasmsPrognosiscancer survivorschilddelivery of health care/methodsorgans at riskradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33325648
PMCPMC7897961
OpenAlexW3112768952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.