Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325618›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2021

Continuous rate infusion of midazolam as emergent treatment for seizures in dogs.

Kathryn Y Bray, Christopher L Mariani, Peter J Early, Karen R Muñana, Natasha J Olby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Intranasal Levetiracetam in Healthy Dogs.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kathryn Y BrayDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3333-2450
Christopher L MarianiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-6536
Peter J EarlyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-8500
Karen R MuñanaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-6276
Natasha J OlbyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-3484
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Department of Clinical Sciences, NC State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidazolam delivered by continuous rate infusion (CRI) might be effective in dogs with cluster seizures (CS) or status epilepticus (SE).

objectiveTo describe the use and safety of midazolam CRI in dogs with CS or SE. ANIMALS: One-hundred six client-owned dogs presenting to a veterinary teaching hospital with CS or SE.

methodsRetrospective review of medical records for dogs with CS or SE treated with a midazolam CRI.

resultsSeventy-nine dogs presented with CS and 27 dogs had SE. Seizure control was achieved in 82/106 dogs (77.4%) receiving a midazolam CRI. The median dose associated with seizure control was 0.3 mg/kg/h (range, 0.1-2.5 mg/kg/h). The median duration of CRI was 25 hours (range, 2-96 hours). Seizures were controlled in 34/40 dogs (85%) with idiopathic epilepsy, 32/43 dogs (74%) with structural epilepsy, 12/16 dogs (75%) with unknown epilepsy, and 4/7 dogs (57%) with reactive seizures (P = .20). Seizure control was achieved in 81% of dogs with CS and 67% in dogs with SE (P = .18). Dogs with idiopathic/unknown epilepsy were more likely to survive than those with structural epilepsy (87% vs 63%, P = .009). Adverse effects were reported in 24 dogs (22.6%) and were mild in all cases. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Midazolam CRI is apparently safe and might be an effective treatment in dogs with CS or SE.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesMidazolamAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDogsHospitals, AnimalHospitals, TeachingRetrospective StudiesSeizuresAnticonvulsantsMidazolamacute repetitive seizuresanticonvulsantbenzodiazepinecaninecluster seizuresepilepsystatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID33325618
PMCPMC7848341
OpenAlexW3111014323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.