ArticleThe oncologist2021
Clinical Application of the FoundationOne CDx Assay to Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.
Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tasurgratinib (E7090) for cholangiocarcinoma with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 fusions/rearrangements: a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2 study.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025Trial
- Africa's emerging role in precision oncology: translational insights from the harnessing functional genomics in cancer research conference, Windhoek, 23-26 September 2025.BMC proceedings · 2026Article
- Bioorthogonal Click Chemistry-Enabled Enrichment of Extracellular Vesicles for Integrated Molecular and Functional Liquid Biopsy§.Accounts of chemical research · 2026Article
- Article
- Site-specific prevalence of the NFE2L2 mutation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive molecular alterations of prostate cancer brain metastases based on a companion diagnostic assay.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- A retrospective study of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and the significance of the PIK3CA mutation for survival.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical Application of In-House Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Thoracic Cancer: Insights From a Japanese Hospital.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Factors associated with actionable gene aberrations in pancreatic cancer based on the C-CAT database.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Risk factors for early mortality among patients with gastrointestinal malignancy in the C-CAT database.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling for advanced pancreatic cancer: insights from real-world data analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology-A Guiding Compass for Targeted Therapy and Emerging Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Genome Profiling-Initiated Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring for Patients With Advanced Cancer.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Imaging features and consideration of progression pattern of diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3 G34-mutant.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Biomarker Discovery in Cancer Genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The promise of PD1/PDL1 targeted immunotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a game-changer for patients outcome?Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Agnostic Biomarkers in Molecular Pathology.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025Review
- The SCRUM-MONSTAR Cancer-Omics Ecosystem: Striving for a Quantum Leap in Precision Medicine.Cancer discovery · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical and Technical Validation of OncoIndxCancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplementation of personalized medicine requires the accessibility of tumor molecular profiling in order to allow prioritization of appropriate targeted therapies for individual patients. Our aim was to study the role of comprehensive genomic profiling assays that may inform treatment recommendations for patients with solid tumors. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of application of the FoundationOne CDx panel-which detects substitutions, insertions and deletions, and copy number alterations in 324 genes, select gene rearrangements, and genomic signatures including microsatellite instability and tumor mutation burden (TMB)-to patients with advanced or recurrent solid tumors before its approval in Japan.
resultsA total of 181 samples were processed for genomic testing between September 2018 and June 2019, with data being successfully obtained for 175 of these samples, yielding a success rate of 96.7%. The median turnaround time was 41 days (range, 21-126 days). The most common known or likely pathogenic variants were TP53 mutations (n = 113), PIK3CA mutations (n = 33), APC mutations (n = 32), and KRAS mutations (n = 29). Among the 153 patients assessed for TMB, the median TMB was 4 mutations/Mb, and tumors with a high TMB (≥10 mutations/Mb) were more prevalent for lung cancer (11/32) than for other solid tumor types (9/121, Fisher's exact test p < .01). No clear trend toward increased efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or ICI combination chemotherapy in patients with a high programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score or a high TMB was apparent. Among the 174 patients found to harbor known or likely pathogenic actionable alterations, 24 individuals (14%) received matched targeted therapy.
conclusionThe FoundationOne CDx assay was performed with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens with a success rate of >95%. Such testing may inform the matching of patients with cancer with investigational or approved targeted drugs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This prospective cohort study was initiated to investigate the feasibility and utility of clinical application of FoundationOne CDx. A total of 181 samples were processed for genomic testing between September 2018 and June 2019, with data being successfully obtained for 175 of these samples, yielding a success rate of 96.7%, and 24 individuals (14%) received matched targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.