Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325545›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2021

Accuracy of bone segmentation and surface generation strategies analyzed by using synthetic CT volumes.

Karolin Engelkes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karolin EngelkesCenter of Natural History (CeNak), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-0754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different kinds of bone measurements are commonly derived from computed-tomography (CT) volumes to answer a multitude of questions in biology and related fields. The underlying steps of bone segmentation and, optionally, polygon surface generation are crucial to keep the measurement error small. In this study, the performance of different, easily accessible segmentation techniques (global thresholding, automatic local thresholding, weighted random walk, neural network, and watershed) and surface generation approaches (different algorithms combined with varying degrees of simplification) was analyzed and recommendations for minimizing inaccuracies were derived. The different approaches were applied to synthetic CT volumes for which the correct segmentation and surface geometry were known. The most accurate segmentations of the synthetic volumes were achieved by setting a case-specific window to the gray value histogram and subsequently applying automatic local thresholding with appropriately chosen thresholding method and radius. Surfaces generated by the Amira® module Generate Lego Surface in combination with careful surface simplification were the most accurate. Surfaces with sub-voxel accuracy were obtained even for synthetic CT volumes with low contrast-to-noise ratios. Segmentation trials with real CT volumes supported the findings. Very accurate segmentations and surfaces can be derived from CT volumes by using readily accessible software packages. The presented results and derived recommendations will help to reduce the measurement error in future studies. Furthermore, the demonstrated strategies for assessing segmentation and surface qualities can be adopted to quantify the performance of new segmentation approaches in future studies.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsBone and BonesHumans3D reconstructionaccessible segmentation techniqueslocal thresholdingsegmentation qualitysub-voxel accuracysurface accuracysurface simplification

Identifiers

PMID33325545
PMCPMC8128766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.