Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325306›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS

Effects of ACEI and ARB on COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis.

Yang Xue, Shaoqing Sun, Jianing Cai, Linwen Zeng, Shihui Wang, Suhuai Wang, Jingjie Li, Lin Sun, Jianmin Huo

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Discontinuation of Antihypertensive Drug Use Compared to Continuation in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yang XueDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-3304
Shaoqing SunDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2865-8133
Jianing CaiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-7090
Linwen ZengDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Shihui WangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-3320
Suhuai WangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jingjie LiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Lin SunDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jianmin HuoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with COVID-19 infection remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis on the effects of ACEI/ARB on disease symptoms and laboratory tests in hypertensive patients infected with COVID-19 virus and those who did not use ACEI/ARB.

methodsWe systematically searched the relevant literatures from Pubmed, Embase, EuropePMC, CNKI, and other databases during the study period of 31 December 2019 (solstice, 15 March 2020), and analyzed the differences in symptoms and laboratory tests between patients with COVID-19 and hypertension who used ACEI/ARB drugs and those who did not. All statistical analyses were performed with REVMAN5.3.

resultsWe included a total of 1808 patients with hypertension diagnosed with COVID-19 in six studies. Analysis results show that ACEI/ARB drugs group D-dimer is lower (SMD = -0.22, 95%CI: -0.36 to -0.06), and the chances of getting fever is lower (OR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.55 to 0.98). Meanwhile, laboratory data and symptoms were not statistical difference, but creatinine tends to rise (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.41).

conclusionWe found that the administration of ACEI/ARB drugs had positive effect on reducing D-dimer and the number of people with fever. Meanwhile it had no significant effect on other laboratory tests (creatinine excepted) or symptoms in patients with COVID-19, while special attention was still needed in patients with renal insufficiency.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublication BiasSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsACEIARBCOVID-19hypertensionmeta analysis

Identifiers

PMID33325306
PMCPMC7747108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.