Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325154›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2021

Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAF

Kaja C G Berg, Tuva H Brunsell, Anita Sveen, Sharmini Alagaratnam, Merete Bjørnslett, Merete Hektoen, Kristoffer W Brudvik, Bård I Røsok, Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, Arild Nesbakken and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The clinical features and prognostic implications of the co-mutated TP53 gene in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaja C G BergDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Tuva H BrunsellDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Anita SveenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Sharmini AlagaratnamDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Merete BjørnslettDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Merete HektoenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Kristoffer W BrudvikK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Bård I RøsokK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Bjørn Atle BjørnbethK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Arild NesbakkenK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Ragnhild A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1693-1032
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatic resection is potentially curative for patients with colorectal liver metastases, but the treatment benefit varies. KRAS/NRAS (RAS)/TP53 co-mutations are associated with a poor prognosis after resection, but there is large variation in patient outcome within the mutation groups, and genetic testing is currently not used to evaluate benefit from surgery. We have investigated the potential for improved prognostic stratification by combined biomarker analysis with DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs), and taking tumor heterogeneity into account. We determined the mutation status of RAS, BRAF

Indexed as

Genes, rasBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomicsGTP PhosphohydrolasesHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsMicrosatellite InstabilityMutationNorwayPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Biomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53colorectal liver metastasesDNA copy number aberrationsgene mutationstumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID33325154
PMCPMC8024718
OpenAlexW3110866358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.