Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33325133›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2021

Breastfeeding practices in Mexico: Results from the National Demographic Dynamic Survey 2006-2018.

Mishel Unar-Munguía, Ana Lilia Lozada-Tequeanes, Dinorah González-Castell, Manuel A Cervantes-Armenta, Anabelle Bonvecchio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Supporting early childhood routines to promote cardiovascular health across the life course.Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mishel Unar-MunguíaCenter for Research on Health and Nutrition, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1156-9337
Ana Lilia Lozada-TequeanesCenter for Research on Health and Nutrition, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7371-3525
Dinorah González-CastellCenter for Research on Health and Nutrition, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2974-3989
Manuel A Cervantes-ArmentaCenter for Research on Health and Nutrition, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Anabelle BonvecchioCenter for Research on Health and Nutrition, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-0818
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although actions have been taken to improve breastfeeding in Mexico, trends over the last decade and their associated factors have not been analysed. We estimated trends in breastfeeding practices at the national, rural/urban, and regional level indigenous ethnicity and socio-economic level, and their associated factors using the National Demographic Dynamics Survey (2006, 2009, 2014 and 2018). We assessed breastfeeding indicators of women with children <24 months according to The World Health Organization recommendations. Logistic regressions models of pooled data were used to estimate trends and associations with biological and sociodemographic characteristics. Between 2006 and 2018, the prevalence of ever breastfed increased from 91.8% to 94.2% (p < 0.001), whereas early initiation of breastfeeding increased from 40.8% to 59.7% (p < 0.001), with similar increments by urban/rural level. Between 2009 and 2018, the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in children <6 months increased from 13.0% to 20.7% (p < 0.001). The largest increase was seen in Mexico City, in nonindigenous women and those with a high socio-economic status, whereas indigenous women and those from the South had the lowest or no improvements. Breastfeeding education during pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.5] was positively associated with exclusive breastfeeding, whereas being employed (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.6-0.9) was negatively associated. Breastfeeding practices improved but are still far from recommendations. Implementing strategies like breastfeeding counselling and programmes and policies that promote and support breastfeeding for poor, indigenous, single and working mothers should be a priority for the government to ensure that all children have the best start in life.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersChildFemaleHumansMexicoPregnancyPrevalenceRural Populationbreastfeeding educationbreastfeeding practicesMexicosocial determinantstrends

Identifiers

PMID33325133
PMCPMC7988861
OpenAlexW3111385269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.