Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324948›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2020

Telemedicine Utilization in Neurosurgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Glimpse Into the Future?

Gaetano De Biase, William D Freeman, Mohamad Bydon, Nathan Smith, Daniel Jerreld, Jorge Pascual, John Casler, Chris Hasse, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, Kingsley Abode-Iyamah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Development of Telemedicine and eHealth in Surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optimizing Door-to-Groin Puncture Time: The Mayo Clinic Experience.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient-Level Factors Associated with Utilization of Telemedicine Services from a Free Clinic During COVID-19.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gaetano De BiaseDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
William D FreemanDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Mohamad BydonDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Nathan SmithDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Daniel JerreldDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Jorge PascualDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
John CaslerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Chris HasseDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Alfredo Quiñones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Kingsley Abode-IyamahDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe telemedicine utilization in neurosurgery at a single tertiary institution to provide outpatient care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with 315 telemedicine visits performed by the neurosurgery department. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic national stay-at-home orders and postponed elective surgeries, we converted upcoming clinic visits into telemedicine visits and rescheduled other patients thought not to be markedly affected by surgical postponement. We reviewed the charts of all patients who had telehealth visits from April 1 through April 30, 2020, and collected demographic information, diagnosis, type of visit, and whether they received surgery; a satisfaction questionnaire was also administered.

resultsIn March 2020, 94% (644 of 685) of the neurosurgery clinic visits were face-to-face, whereas in April 2020, 55% (315 of 573) of the visits were telemedicine (

conclusionRapid implementation of telemedicine to evaluate neurosurgery patients became an effective tool for preoperative consultation, postoperative and follow-up visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and decreased risks of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to patients and health care staff. Future larger studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine used to triage surgical from nonsurgical patients, potential cost-savings from reducing travel burdens and lost work time, improved access, reduced wait times, and impact on patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

CD, compact discCMS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesCOVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019EMR, electronic medical recordHIPPA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability ActSARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID33324948
PMCPMC7728424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.