Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324935›Full record

ReviewNeurological research and practice2020

Diagnosis and therapy of functional tremor a systematic review illustrated by a case report.

Michael Bartl, Rebekka Kewitsch, Mark Hallett, Martin Tegenthoff, Walter Paulus

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Electrophysiology in Functional Movement Disorders: An Update.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael BartlDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Robert Koch Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7752-2443
Rebekka KewitschDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Robert Koch Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Mark HallettNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 7D37 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-1428 USA.
Martin TegenthoffDepartment of Neurology, BG-University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Ruhr-University, Bürkle de la Camp-Platz 1, Bochum, 44789 Germany.
Walter PaulusDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Robert Koch Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DENational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of functional movement disorders and specifically functional tremor (FT) (representing 50% of them) remains demanding. Additionally, due to heterogeneity of the disorders, structured concepts and guidelines for diagnosis and therapy are difficult to establish. Ascertaining the state of knowledge to derive instructions for operating procedures is the aim of this review. MAIN TEXT: Based on a standardized systematic literature research using the term "psychogenic tremor" in the MEDLINE database dating back ten years, 76 studies were evaluated. Conventional features of FT are variability of frequency and amplitude. Further, response to distraction by motor and cognitive tasks is a key diagnostic feature in differentiation between organic and functional origin. A variety of electrophysiological tests have been evaluated including surface electromyography and accelerometry to establish laboratory-supported criteria for diagnosing tremor. Also, finger tapping tests have been used to identify FT, showing positive potential as supplementary evidence.Imaging studies in general are mostly underpowered and imaging cannot be used on an individual basis. Therapeutic studies in FT often have a diagnostic component. Cognitive behavioral therapy should be the preferred psychological treatment independent of additional psychiatric symptoms. Other psychotherapeutic methods show lack of evidence concerning FT. Relaxation techniques and physiotherapy are an important additional feature, especially in children and adolescents. In regard to drug therapy, randomized and blinded trials are not available. A significant decrease in rating scales could be detected after active, not sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with a long-lasting effect. Also root magnetic stimulation seems to be effective. The clinical feature of tremor entrainment in FT can be used in combination with biofeedback as so-called tremor retrainment, using self-modulation of frequency and severity, to bring the movements under volitional control.

conclusionDiagnosis and treatment of FT is challenging and should include a combination of intensive clinical examination and targeted addition of standardized testing, especially electrophysiological methods. Often therapeutic effects have a diagnostic component. A multimodal strategy, considering psychological factors as a potential origin as well as maintaining effects seems to be most effective.

Identifiers

PMID33324935
PMCPMC7713151
OpenAlexW3107619312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.