Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324790›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Arijit Mal, Pranay Dey, Robert Michael Hayes, Justin V McCarthy, Arjun Ray, Abhijit De

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arijit MalMolecular Functional Imaging Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai 410210, India.
Pranay DeyMolecular Functional Imaging Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai 410210, India.
Robert Michael HayesSignal Transduction Laboratory, School of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, University College Cork, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland.
Justin V McCarthySignal Transduction Laboratory, School of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, University College Cork, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland.
Arjun RayComputational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi 110020, India.
Abhijit DeMolecular Functional Imaging Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai 410210, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INUniversity College Cork · IEIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is a transmembrane cell adhesion glycoprotein, which primarily contributes to stemness, proliferation, and metastasis properties of tumor cells. Regulated intramembrane proteolysis by ADAM proteases and γ-secretase cleaves EpCAM into an ∼27 kDa soluble extracellular and an ∼4 kDa cytoplasmic domain (EpICD). After the EpICD fragment is released inside the cell, the formation of a nuclear signaling complex with the FHL2 molecule is critical for exerting its regulatory role. Trop-2, a homologous protein of EpCAM, undergoes phosphorylation in its cytoplasmic domain (Trop-IC). The phosphorylation of Trop-2 is reported to be crucial for its function. This led us to ask the fundamental question if EpCAM does undergo similar post-translational modification(PTM) like its homologous protein to carry out its diverse biological function. Here, we identify a putative phosphorylation site at Tyr297 located in the cytoplasmic domain of EpCAM. Molecular dynamic simulation (MDS) of 90 ns was carried out to understand the biological/functional relevance of the putative phosphorylation. It was observed that this phosphorylation stabilizes the α-helical structure of the EpICD. Though Tyr297 does not affect the γ-secretase mediated cleavage of EpCAM, it affects the binding of EpICD to FHL2. Docking analysis revealed that phosphorylation mediated structural stability of EpICD positively impacts its binding affinity with FHL2, which was further validated using 100 ns MDS. Phosphorylated EpICD forms higher numbers of hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, and other non-bonded interactions with FHL2, leading to enhanced interactions. This

Identifiers

PMID33324790
PMCPMC7726786
OpenAlexW3107775148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.