Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324583›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Key Limitations and New Insights Into the

Marie-Noëlle Mévélec, Zineb Lakhrif, Isabelle Dimier-Poisson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ROP64-DeficientMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Advances and Translational Challenges inVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deletion ofBiomedicines · 2022
    Article
  14. Mining the Proteome ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  15. Seroprevalence ofPeerJ · 2022
    Article
  16. Comprehensive Overview ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. BioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  19. Enhancing Immune Responses to a DNA Vaccine EncodingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Noëlle MévélecTeam BioMAP, Université de Tours, INRAE, ISP, Tours, France.
Zineb LakhrifTeam BioMAP, Université de Tours, INRAE, ISP, Tours, France.
Isabelle Dimier-PoissonTeam BioMAP, Université de Tours, INRAE, ISP, Tours, France.
Université de Tours · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic disease affecting human, livestock and cat. Prophylactic strategies would be ideal to prevent infection. In a One Health vaccination approach, the objectives would be the prevention of congenital disease in both women and livestock, prevention/reduction of

Indexed as

ParasitesProtozoan VaccinesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanHumansLivestockMiceProtozoan ProteinsAntibodies, ProtozoanProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan VaccinesbrabyzoitedifferentiationimmunitysporozoitetachyzoiteT. gondiivaccine

Identifiers

PMID33324583
PMCPMC7724089
OpenAlexW3110004252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.