ArticleGlobal food security2020
Choosing awareness over fear: Risk analysis and free trade support global food security.
Article in Global food security, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on the impact and mechanism of digital economy on China's food production capacity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review: Impact of food safety on global trade.Veterinary medicine and science · 2024Review
- Health infrastructure evaluations of trading partners for equivalence: Why they are important and current hurdles for One Health collaboration.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024Review
- Trade for Food Security: The Stability of Global Agricultural Trade Networks.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Risk of Foot and Mouth Disease among Beef Cattle at Slaughter from East African Production Systems.Viruses · 2021Article
- Urban-Rural Partnership Framework to Enhance Food-Energy-Water Security in the Post-COVID-19 Era.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Article
- The water-energy-food nexus and COVID-19: Towards a systematization of impacts and responses.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Livestock production and global trade are key components to achieving food security, but are bedfellows with the risk for emergence and spread of infectious diseases. The World Trade Organization's Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures outlines provisions for member countries to protect animal, plant, and public health while promoting free trade. The capacity for risk analysis equips countries to increase access to export markets, improve local animal health and food safety regarding known hazards, and build the institutional capacity to respond to unexpected events. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to detect, report, and implement effective response measures to emerging challenges on a local and global scale, and it is crucial that these measures are implemented in a way that supports food production and trade. The use of risk analysis coupled with sound understanding of underlying system dynamics will contribute to resilient and enduring food systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.