ReviewCureus2020
The London Major Trauma Network System: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of traumatic injuries on work productivity and economic burden among post-hospitalisation patients in Vietnam.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating Acute Polytrauma Rehabilitation: A Literature Review With Insights From the UK Major Trauma Network.Cureus · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of emergency medical systems in the UK and Japan: recommendations for Japan based on on-site observations in the UK.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Integrating Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Multiple Trauma Care: Current Evidence and Clinical Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessing the Effectiveness and Accessibility of Trauma Care in East London: A Comprehensive Evaluation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Strengthening trauma resuscitation education and training in low-resource settings: A call for global inclusion.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Open lower limb fracture reconstruction in the elderly population: the experience of a major trauma centre.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Review
- The London Regional Major Trauma System: A Literature Review of Epidemiology and Current and Future Challenges.Cureus · 2024Review
- Challenges to the development of the trauma system in Egypt.Journal of public health in Africa · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trauma is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide and is a major global public health problem. The provision of trauma care has been substandard in England and Wales prior to the implementation of an inclusive major trauma network system in London in 2010 and subsequently across the rest of England two years later. The implementation of the London trauma system has brought about improvements to the delivery of trauma care by decreasing the overall morbidity and mortality significantly. This framework encompasses the collaboration of emergency services, designated Major Trauma Centres (MTCs), Trauma Units (TUs) and community providers which have been optimized with the expertise and resources to provide the best outcomes for major trauma patients. Specific triage protocols, consultant-led trauma service and on-the-spot access to radiology services and operating theatres have played a pivotal role in the improvement of trauma care. In spite of several strengths, however, the London major trauma network system is by no means without its limitations. The emergence of the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created major barriers to the smooth running of trauma services by exhausting resources due to infection control measures, reduced theatre space and re-deployment of medical staffs. In addition, the cancellation of elective surgeries has impacted directly on the training of surgical trainees by leaving them with significantly reduced surgical exposure. As a results of this ever changing surgical landscape, a need to urgently review these traditional surgical training methods with a view to modernize the curriculum. Although the London trauma system has evolved significantly since its implementation, its limitations should be recognized and addressed to enhance performance and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.