Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2020

Adult Mouse Retina Explants: From

Julia Schaeffer, Céline Delpech, Floriane Albert, Stephane Belin, Homaira Nawabi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Adult Mouse Retina Explants: FromFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia SchaefferUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U 1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Céline DelpechUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U 1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Floriane AlbertUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U 1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Stephane BelinUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U 1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Homaira NawabiUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U 1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRGrenoble Institute of Neurosciences · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, adult neurons fail to regenerate following any insult to adult central nervous system (CNS), which leads to a permanent and irreversible loss of motor and cognitive functions. For a long time, much effort has been deployed to uncover mechanisms of axon regeneration in the CNS. Even if some cases of functional recovery have been reported, there is still a discrepancy regarding the functionality of a neuronal circuit upon lesion. Today, there is a need not only to identify new molecules implicated in adult CNS axon regeneration, but also to decipher the fine molecular mechanisms associated with regeneration failure. Here, we propose to use cultures of adult retina explants to study all molecular and cellular mechanisms that occur during CNS regeneration. We show that adult retinal explant cultures have the advantages to (i) recapitulate all the features observed

Indexed as

axonal transportaxon regenerationcentral nervous systemexplantsex vivogrowth coneoptic nerveretinal ganglion cells

Identifiers

PMID33324161
PMCPMC7723849
OpenAlexW3107281376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.