Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324126›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2020

Mental Health and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes Among Frontline Health Workers During the Peak of COVID-19 Outbreak in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hung Manh Than, Vuong Minh Nong, Cap Trung Nguyen, Khiem Phu Dong, Hoa Thi Ngo, Tra Thu Doan, Nga Thu Do, Trang Huyen Thi Nguyen, Thanh Van Do, Co Xuan Dao and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hung Manh Than *Emergency Department, National Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vuong Minh Nong *Center for Tropical Diseases, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Cap Trung NguyenEmergency Department, National Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Khiem Phu DongNational Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hoa Thi NgoOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-9320-4050
Tra Thu DoanCenter for Tropical Diseases, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nga Thu DoCenter for Tropical Diseases, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Trang Huyen Thi NguyenDepartment of Public Health, Thang Long University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thanh Van DoCenter for Tropical Diseases, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Co Xuan DaoBach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tuan Quang NguyenBach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-4039-8706
Thach Ngoc PhamNational Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Cuong Duy DoCenter for Tropical Diseases, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-1565-642X
Bạch Mai Hospital · VNHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNThang Long University · VNOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMental health is an important component of the protection strategy for healthcare workers (HCWs). However, it has not been well described in Vietnam during the COVID-19 outbreak. This study aims to measure the psychological distress and health-related quality-of-life among frontline healthcare workers during the peak of the outbreak in Vietnam. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey on 173 health workers at two national tertiary hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam from March to April 2020. The psychological distress was measured by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21), Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). EQ-5D-5L was used to determine the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes.

resultsAmong 173 HCWs, the proportion of reported depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and stress was 20.2%, 33.5%, and 12.7%, respectively. The median EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.93 (IQR=0.85-0.94), and the anxiety/depression aspect had the highest reported problems. The most COVID-19-specific concerns among frontline HCWs were the reduction of income (59%) and the increase of living costs (54.3%). HCWs working in the COVID-19-designated hospital had a significantly higher rate of mental health problems and had a lower HRQoL outcome than those working in non-COVID-19-designated hospitals. Other factors associated with psychological distress and sleep problems include age, job title, income, chronic diseases status, and years of working in healthcare settings. HCWs who were ≥30 years old, had higher working years, had higher incomes, and had mental health and sleep problems were more likely to have lower HRQoL scores.

conclusionWe reported a moderate rate of psychological distress and lower HRQoL outcomes among frontline HCWs during the COVID-19 outbreak in Vietnam. Various factors were found to be associated with mental health and HRQoL that might be useful for implementing appropriate interventions for HCWs in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19health-related quality-of-lifehealth workersmental healthpsychological distressSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33324126
PMCPMC7733435
OpenAlexW3110854684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.