Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324120›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Physiological Vibration Acceleration (Phybrata) Sensor Assessment of Multi-System Physiological Impairments and Sensory Reweighting Following Concussion.

John D Ralston, Ashutosh Raina, Brian W Benson, Ryan M Peters, Joshua M Roper, Andreas B Ralston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06846047 (Therapeutic Effects of Electrical Vestibular Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06846047 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Effects of Electrical Vestibular Stimulation (EVS) on Balance and Gait

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeursantys IncRan2025 to 2027Enrolled500ConditionsVestibulopathyArmselectrical vestibular stimulation (EVS), Sham Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John D RalstonPROTXX, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8092-9076
Ashutosh RainaCenter of Excellence for Pediatric Neurology, Rocklin, CA 95765, USA.
Brian W BensonBenson Concussion Institute, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6B7, Canada.
Ryan M PetersFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Joshua M RoperPROTXX, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Andreas B RalstonPROTXX, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-3167
Sports Concussion Institute · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the utility of a head-mounted wearable inertial motion unit (IMU)-based physiological vibration acceleration ("phybrata") sensor to support the clinical diagnosis of concussion, classify and quantify specific concussion-induced physiological system impairments and sensory reweighting, and track individual patient recovery trajectories.

methodsData were analyzed from 175 patients over a 12-month period at three clinical sites. Comprehensive clinical concussion assessments were first completed for all patients, followed by testing with the phybrata sensor. Phybrata time series data and spatial scatter plots, eyes open (Eo) and eyes closed (Ec) phybrata powers, average power (Eo+Ec)/2, Ec/Eo phybrata power ratio, time-resolved phybrata spectral density (TRPSD) distributions, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are compared for individuals with no objective impairments and those clinically diagnosed with concussions and accompanying vestibular impairment, other neurological impairment, or both vestibular and neurological impairments. Finally, pre- and post-injury phybrata case report results are presented for a participant who was diagnosed with a concussion and subsequently monitored during treatment, rehabilitation, and return-to-activity clearance.

resultsPhybrata data demonstrate distinct features and patterns for individuals with no discernable clinical impairments, diagnosed vestibular pathology, and diagnosed neurological pathology. ROC curves indicate that the average power (Eo+Ec)/2 may be utilized to support clinical diagnosis of concussion, while Eo and Ec/Eo may be utilized as independent measures to confirm accompanying neurological and vestibular impairments, respectively. All 3 measures demonstrate area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity above 90% for their respective diagnoses. Phybrata spectral analyses demonstrate utility for quantifying the severity of concussion-induced physiological impairments, sensory reweighting, and subsequent monitoring of improvements throughout treatment and rehabilitation.

conclusionPhybrata testing assists with objective concussion diagnosis and provides an important adjunct to standard concussion assessment tools by objectively ascertaining neurological and vestibular impairments, guiding targeted rehabilitation strategies, monitoring recovery, and assisting with return-to-sport/work/learn decision-making.

Indexed as

concussionmulti-system impairmentphysiological vibration accelerationsensory reweightingwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID33324120
PMCPMC7733539
OpenAlexW3112876226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.