ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2020
The Effects of Irradiance on Translucency and Surface Gloss of Different Bulk-Fill Composite Resins: An in vitro Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of bleaching applications on stained bulk-fill resin composites.BMC oral health · 2022Trial
- The effects of mechanical and chemical degradation on the surface roughness, gloss, and color stability of bulk-fill resin composites.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Color Stability, Gloss Retention, and Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed versus Indirect Prefabricated Veneers.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Influence of atmospheric pressure changes on dentin bond strength of conventional, bulk-fill and single-shade resin composites.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2022Article
- [Light-curing effectiveness using led lamps: a review].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe influence of different light-emitting diode (LED) curing light intensities on the translucency and surface gloss of bulk-fill resin-based composite (RBC) restorative materials was evaluated. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty specimens of each RBC (Filtek One bulk-fill posterior, Reveal HD bulk, Tetric N-Ceram, and Filtek Z350) were prepared. The RBCs were shaped into molds and cured using an LED curing light unit at high intensity (1,200 mW/cm
resultsThe highest translucency value was observed for Reveal HD (7.688 ± 0.861) with a high curing intensity, while Filtek One showed the lowest value (1.750 ± 0.376) with a low curing intensity. The materials showed no significant difference in surface gloss with a high curing intensity. With low-intensity light curing, Filtek One showed the highest gloss value (55.270 ± 10.106), while Tetric N-Ceram and Reveal HD showed the lowest gloss values (35.560 ± 6.533 and 35.680 ± 6.648, respectively).
conclusionCuring light intensity had no effect on both the gloss and translucency for all the materials tested, although for Tetric N-Ceram, higher intensity corresponded to higher gloss values while for Filtek One, higher intensity corresponded to a higher translucency value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.