Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33324060›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2020

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Safety with Respect to Seizures: A Literature Review.

Debra J Stultz, Savanna Osburn, Tyler Burns, Sylvia Pawlowska-Wajswol, Robin Walton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05099419 (Motor Cortical Neuromodulation With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Women With Overactive Bladder and Urgency Urinary Incontinence), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05099419 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Motor Cortical Neuromodulation With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Women With Overactive Bladder and Urgency Urinary Incontinence

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsOveractive Bladder, Urge IncontinenceArmsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debra J StultzStultz Sleep & Behavioral Health, Barboursville, WV 25504, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5461-9341
Savanna OsburnStultz Sleep & Behavioral Health, Barboursville, WV 25504, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2965-0133
Tyler BurnsStultz Sleep & Behavioral Health, Barboursville, WV 25504, USA.
Sylvia Pawlowska-WajswolStultz Sleep & Behavioral Health, Barboursville, WV 25504, USA.
Robin WaltonStultz Sleep & Behavioral Health, Barboursville, WV 25504, USA.
Wolters Kluwer Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation is an increasingly popular FDA-approved treatment for resistant depression, migraines, and OCD. Research is also underway for its use in various other psychiatric and medical disorders. Although rare, seizures are a potential adverse event of TMS treatment. In this article, we discuss TMS-related seizures with the various coils used to deliver TMS, the risk factors associated with seizures, the differential diagnosis of its presentations, the effects of sleep deprivation and alcohol use on seizures, as well as seizure risks with protocols for traditional TMS, theta-burst stimulation, and accelerated TMS. A discussion is presented comparing the potential risk of seizures with various psychotropic medications versus TMS. Included are case reports of TMS seizures in the child/adolescent patient, bipolar disorder patients, patients with a history of a traumatic brain injury, and those with epilepsy. Reports are also shared on TMS use without seizures in patients with a history of head injuries and TMS's continued use if patients have a seizure during their TMS treatment. Findings generated in this review suggest the following. Seizures, if present, are usually self-limiting. Most treatment recommendations for TMS-related seizures are supportive in nature. The risk of TMS-related seizures is <1% overall. TMS has successfully been used in patients with epilepsy, traumatic brain injuries, and those with a prior TMS-related seizure. The rate of TMS-related seizures is comparable to that of most psychotropic medications. While having a seizure is a rare but serious adverse effect of TMS, the benefits of treating refractory depression with TMS may outweigh the risk of suicidal ideation and other significant complications of depression.

Indexed as

head injuries and transcranial magnetic stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation in children and adolescentstranscranial magnetic stimulation in epilepsy patientstranscranial magnetic stimulation-related seizurestranscranial magnetic stimulation safety

Identifiers

PMID33324060
PMCPMC7732158
OpenAlexW3112271390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.