Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33323984›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2021

Ophthalmology training in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

William H Dean, John C Buchan, Stephen Gichuhi, Hannah Faal, Caleb Mpyet, Serge Resnikoff, Iris Gordon, Ibrahim Matende, Andrew Samuel, Linda Visser and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The future of cataract surgery.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why is ophthalmology so brilliant?Eye (London, England) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

William H DeanInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Topical Medicine, London, UK. will.dean@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3042-8281
John C BuchanInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Topical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-7011
Stephen GichuhiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7062-4869
Hannah FaalUniversity of Calabar and Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria.
Caleb MpyetDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Serge ResnikoffInternational Health & Development, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-4446
Iris GordonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Topical Medicine, London, UK.
Ibrahim MatendeLighthouse for Christ Eye Centre, Mombasa, Kenya.
Andrew SamuelUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Linda VisserDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Topical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa is home to 12% of the global population, and 4.3 million are blind and over 15 million are visually impaired. There are only 2.5 ophthalmologists per million people in SSA. Training of ophthalmologists is critical. We designed a systematic literature review protocol, searched MEDLINE Ovid and Embase OVID on 1 August 2019 and limited these searches to the year 2000 onwards. We also searched Google Scholar and websites of ophthalmic institutions for additional information. We include a total of 49 references in this review and used a narrative approach to synthesise the results. There are 56 training institutions for ophthalmologists in eleven Anglophone, eleven Francophone, and two Lusophone SSA countries. The median duration of ophthalmology training programmes was 4 years. Most curricula have been regionally standardised. National, regional and international collaborations are a key feature to ophthalmology training in more than half of ophthalmology training programmes. There is a drive, although perhaps not always evidence-based, for sub-specialisation in the region. Available published scientific data on ophthalmic medical and surgical training in SSA is sparse, especially for Francophone and Lusophone countries. However, through a broad scoping review strategy it has been possible to obtain a valuable and detailed view of ophthalmology training in SSA. Training of ophthalmologists is a complex and multi-faceted task. There are challenges in appropriate selection, capacity, and funding of available training institutions. Numerous learning outcomes demand curriculum, time, faculty, support, and appropriate assessment. There are opportunities provided by modern training approaches. Partnership is key.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyAfrica South of the SaharaCurriculumHumans

Identifiers

PMID33323984
PMCPMC8115070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.