ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2020
[First universal newborn screening program for severe combined immunodeficiency in Europe. Three-years' experience in Catalonia.]
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- [Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID) in Germany].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), the most severe form of T-cell immunodeficiency, can be screened at birth by quantifying T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) in dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Early detection of this condition speeds up the establishment of appropriate treatment and increases the patient's life expectancy. Newborn screening for SCID started in January 2017 in Catalonia, the first Spanish and European region to universally include this testing. The results obtained in the first three years and a half of experience (January 2017 - June 2020) are shown here, using EnLite Neonatal TREC kit (Perkin Elmer) with 20 copies/µL as TREC detection cutoff. Of 222,857 newborns screened, 48 tested positive: three patients were diagnosed with SCID (incidence 1:74,285); 17 patients had clinically significant T-cell lymphopenia (non-SCID) with an incidence of 1 in 13,109 newborns; twenty two patients were considered false-positive cases because of an initially normal lymphocyte count with normalization of TREC between 3 and 6 months of life; one case had transient lymphopenia due to an initially low lymphocyte count with recovery in the following months; and five patients are still under study. The results obtained provide further evidence of the benefits of including this disease in newborn screening programs. Even longer follow-up could be necessary to define the exact incidence of SCID in Catalonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33323927PMC11582760W3115042270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.