Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33323918›Full record

ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2020

[Evaluation and perspective of 20 years of neonatal screening in Galicia. Program results.]

Paula Sánchez Pintos, José Ángel Cocho de Juan, M Dolores Bóveda Fontán, Daisy E Castiñeiras Ramos, Cristóbal Colón Mejeras, Agustin Javier Iglesias Rodríguez, María José de Castro López, José Ramón Alonso Fernández, José María Fraga Bermúdez, María Luz Couce Pico

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. OdimetNutrients · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula Sánchez PintosUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
José Ángel Cocho de JuanUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
M Dolores Bóveda FontánUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
Daisy E Castiñeiras RamosUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
Cristóbal Colón MejerasUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
Agustin Javier Iglesias RodríguezUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
María José de Castro LópezUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
José Ramón Alonso FernándezUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
José María Fraga BermúdezUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
María Luz Couce PicoUnidad de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Enfermedades Metabólicas Congénitas. Servicio de Neonatología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Santiago de Compostela. España.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Galician newborn screening program for early detection of endocrine and metabolic diseases began in 1978 and was a pioneer in expanded newborn screening in Spain with the incorporation of mass spectrometry in July 2000. As a primary objective, 28 diseases are screened, including those recommended SNS except sickle cell anemia which is in the inclusion phase. In its 20-year history, 404,616 newborns (nb) have been analyzed, identifying 547 cases affected by the diseases included, with a global incidence of 1: 739 newborns and 1: 1.237 of the screened inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) (1:1.580 nb if excluding benign hyperphenylalaninemia-HPA), with an average participation of 99.35%, progressively higher during the analyzed period. Among the pathologies screened, congenital hypothyroidism (1:2.211 nb), cystinuria (1:4.129 nb) and HPA (1:5.699 nb), followed by phenylketonuria and cystic fibrosis (1:10,936 nb) stand out for their incidence. Sixty-six cases of false positives were identified (seventeen of them in relation to maternal pathology) and five false negatives, being the overall PPV and NPV of the program respectively of 89.2% and 99.99%, with a sensitivity of 99.09% and a specificity of 99.98%. The mortality rate of diagnosed CME patients is 1.52%, with eleven cases presenting symptoms prior to the screening result (2%). The intelligence quotient of IEM patients at risk of neurological involvement is normal in more than 95% of cases.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningCongenital HypothyroidismCystic FibrosisFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaleMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsProgram EvaluationSensitivity and SpecificitySpainCongenital hypothyroidismCystic fibrosisInborn errors of metabolismNewborn screeningSensitivitySpainSpecificity

Identifiers

PMID33323918
PMCPMC11582800
OpenAlexW3118167748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.