Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33323600›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Impact of ophthalmic webinars on the resident's learning experience during COVID-19 pandemic: An insight into its present and future prospects.

Sushobhan Dasgupta, Tarannum Shakeel, Priyanka Gupta, Ashish Kakkar, Vatsala Vats, Monika Jain, Viraj Rathi, Juhi Panwar, Kavleen Kaur, Himani Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Analysis of COVID-19 publications in theIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ophthalmology Residents: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sushobhan DasguptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Tarannum ShakeelDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Priyanka GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Ashish KakkarDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Vatsala VatsDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Monika JainDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Viraj RathiDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Juhi PanwarDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Kavleen KaurDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Himani GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, SGRR-Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the impact of ophthalmic webinars on the resident's learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic (CP).

methodsThis cross-sectional nationwide study was carried out for 1 month during CP and included a total of 382 ophthalmic residents. A questionnaire was sent through various social media platforms.

resultsResidents expressed a decline in their clinical exposure (74%; 220), thesis work (58%; 218), and acquisition of the knowledge and skills (42.5%; 161) during CP. Benefits of webinars as perceived by the residents included gain in additional knowledge (77%; 286), feedback on queries (56%; 209), access to multiple speakers (50%; 191), and topics (30%; 110). Nearly 75% (291) of residents endorsed webinars as good to the very good academic tool, and 54% (202) preferred to continue attending webinars in the post-CP phase. However, connectivity/download/data issues (54%; 200) followed by loss of personal touch (53%; 188), lengthy or irrelevant topic (37%; 134), and poor transmission quality (33%; 121) were major deterrents against the webinar.

conclusionThe current study generated overall mixed responses from the ophthalmic postgraduate residents in favor of webinars. In the present format, webinars bear enormous potentials to supplement the traditional learning tools by providing uninterrupted learning experiences. However, they are still limited by their pedagogical and technical issues.

Indexed as

InternetLearningPandemicsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleOphthalmologyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 pandemicimpactophthalmologyresidentssurveywebinar

Identifiers

PMID33323600
PMCPMC7926168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.