ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Intraocular endoscopy: A review.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical course and outcomes of corneal blood staining in open-globe injury: Eye Injury Vitrectomy Study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effects of Image Processing Using Honeycomb-Removal and Image-Sharpening Algorithms on Visibility of 27-Gauge Endoscopic Vitrectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- High-Resolution Ex-Vivo Imaging of Retina with a Laptop-Based Portable Endoscope.Journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Perioperative Nursing of Vitrectomy for Ocular Trauma under the Guidance of Ophthalmoscope.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Value of Ocular Endoscopy in Extraction of Intraocular Foreign Bodies of Cilia in Patients with Open Ocular Trauma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Management of a misidentified and misnumbered intraocular glass foreign body with an endoscope in a case of endophthalmitis.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Comment on: Intraocular endoscopy: A review.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Commentary: Ocular endoscopy: An eye into the eye.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Endoscopic Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Patients With Open-Globe Injury and Corneal Opacity.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
- Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma compared to alternative procedures -A Systematic review.Oman journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal visualization is one of the most challenging aspects of performing vitreoretinal surgery. In situations where conventional microscopic techniques provide poor posterior visualization, the adjunctive skill set of endoscopic visualization may be needed. This allows for by-passing the opaque anterior segment media and getting access to the posterior segment pathology. Endoscopic vitrectomy is a useful and unique adjunct to microincision vitreoretinal surgery. The optical set-up of endoscopy allows for clinical approaches that are impossible with regular microscope viewing systems. These include the ability to observe across optically significant anterior segment opacities and directly visualize the posterior segment of the eye. It also allows for visualizing the difficult-to-access retroirideal, retrolental, and anterior retinal structures. Surgical access to anatomic spaces like the pars plana, pars plicata, ciliary sulcus, ciliary body, and peripheral lens is tedious. This is made simpler by endoscopy. In this review, we summarize and review the usage of the intraocular endoscope as a diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium across a wide spectrum of ocular pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.