Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33323129›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

Metapangenomics of the oral microbiome provides insights into habitat adaptation and cultivar diversity.

Daniel R Utter, Gary G Borisy, A Murat Eren, Colleen M Cavanaugh, Jessica L Mark Welch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Site-specialization of human oralbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Spatial ecology of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synergistic action of specialized metabolites from divergent biosynthesis in the human oral microbiome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Essential genes formSystems · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel R UtterDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. dutter@g.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3322-7108
Gary G BorisyThe Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
A Murat ErenThe Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA.
Colleen M CavanaughDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. cavanaug@fas.harvard.edu.
Jessica L Mark WelchThe Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA. jmarkwelch@mbl.edu.
Harvard University · USMarine Biological Laboratory · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
ULTRASTRUCTURE AND CYTOMORPHOLOGY COREP30DK042086 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LIU, CAMBRIAN YANGSHAO · 1990 to 2025
$29.8M
Spatial Organization of the Oral MicrobiomeR01DE022586 · NIDCR · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI Jessica Leigh Mark Welch · 2013 to 2026
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022586NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK042086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing availability of microbial genomes and environmental shotgun metagenomes provides unprecedented access to the genomic differences within related bacteria. The human oral microbiome with its diverse habitats and abundant, relatively well-characterized microbial inhabitants presents an opportunity to investigate bacterial population structures at an ecosystem scale.

resultsHere, we employ a metapangenomic approach that combines public genomes with Human Microbiome Project (HMP) metagenomes to study the diversity of microbial residents of three oral habitats: tongue dorsum, buccal mucosa, and supragingival plaque. For two exemplar taxa, Haemophilus parainfluenzae and the genus Rothia, metapangenomes reveal distinct genomic groups based on shared genome content. H. parainfluenzae genomes separate into three distinct subgroups with differential abundance between oral habitats. Functional enrichment analyses identify an operon encoding oxaloacetate decarboxylase as diagnostic for the tongue-abundant subgroup. For the genus Rothia, grouping by shared genome content recapitulates species-level taxonomy and habitat preferences. However, while most R. mucilaginosa are restricted to the tongue as expected, two genomes represent a cryptic population of R. mucilaginosa in many buccal mucosa samples. For both H. parainfluenzae and the genus Rothia, we identify not only limitations in the ability of cultivated organisms to represent populations in their native environment, but also specifically which cultivar gene sequences are absent or ubiquitous.

conclusionsOur findings provide insights into population structure and biogeography in the mouth and form specific hypotheses about habitat adaptation. These results illustrate the power of combining metagenomes and pangenomes to investigate the ecology and evolution of bacteria across analytical scales.

Indexed as

MetagenomeBacteriaChromosome MappingHaemophilus parainfluenzaeHumansMicrobiotaMicrococcaceaeMouthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiogeographyHaemophilus parainfluenzaeMetagenomesOral microbiomePangenomesPopulation structureRothia

Identifiers

PMID33323129
PMCPMC7739467
OpenAlexW3111316098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.