ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Graph embeddings on gene ontology annotations for protein-protein interaction prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Protein Sequence Analysis landscape: A Systematic Review of Task Types, Databases, Datasets, Word Embeddings Methods, and Language Models.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Pooled it
- The role of protein embeddings for protein-protein interaction prediction with graph neural networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- GeOKG: geometry-aware knowledge graph embedding for Gene Ontology and genes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Predicting gene disease associations with knowledge graph embeddings for diseases with curtailed information.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of input data modality choices on functional gene embeddings.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Novel drug-target interactions via link prediction and network embedding.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Deep Learning-Powered Prediction of Human-Virus Protein-Protein Interactions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Computational Systems Biology of Alfalfa - Bacterial Blight Host-Pathogen Interactions: Uncovering the Complex Molecular Networks for Developing Durable Disease Resistant Crop.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction is an important task towards the understanding of many bioinformatics functions and applications, such as predicting protein functions, gene-disease associations and disease-drug associations. However, many previous PPI prediction researches do not consider missing and spurious interactions inherent in PPI networks. To address these two issues, we define two corresponding tasks, namely missing PPI prediction and spurious PPI prediction, and propose a method that employs graph embeddings that learn vector representations from constructed Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) graphs and then use embedded vectors to achieve the two tasks. Our method leverages on information from both term-term relations among GO terms and term-protein annotations between GO terms and proteins, and preserves properties of both local and global structural information of the GO annotation graph.
resultsWe compare our method with those methods that are based on information content (IC) and one method that is based on word embeddings, with experiments on three PPI datasets from STRING database. Experimental results demonstrate that our method is more effective than those compared methods.
conclusionOur experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of using graph embeddings to learn vector representations from undirected GOA graphs for our defined missing and spurious PPI tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.