ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
DRACP: a novel method for identification of anticancer peptides.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep capsule neural network for identifying anticancer peptides using sequence to image transformation-based local embedded features.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Anti-Cancer Peptides: Status and Future Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- ACP-ADA: A Boosting Method with Data Augmentation for Improved Prediction of Anticancer Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Hunting for Novel Routes in Anticancer Drug Discovery: Peptides against Sam-Sam Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Development of Anticancer Peptides Using Artificial Intelligence and Combinational Therapy for Cancer Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Machine learning-enabled predictive modeling to precisely identify the antimicrobial peptides.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
- ACP-DA: Improving the Prediction of Anticancer Peptides Using Data Augmentation.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMillions of people are suffering from cancers, but accurate early diagnosis and effective treatment are still tough for all doctors. Common ways against cancer include surgical operation, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, they are all very harmful for patients. Recently, the anticancer peptides (ACPs) have been discovered to be a potential way to treat cancer. Since ACPs are natural biologics, they are safer than other methods. However, the experimental technology is an expensive way to find ACPs so we purpose a new machine learning method to identify the ACPs.
resultsFirstly, we extracted the feature of ACPs in two aspects: sequence and chemical characteristics of amino acids. For sequence, average 20 amino acids composition was extracted. For chemical characteristics, we classified amino acids into six groups based on the patterns of hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues. Then, deep belief network has been used to encode the features of ACPs. Finally, we purposed Random Relevance Vector Machines to identify the true ACPs. We call this method 'DRACP' and tested the performance of it on two independent datasets. Its AUC and AUPR are higher than 0.9 in both datasets.
conclusionWe developed a novel method named 'DRACP' and compared it with some traditional methods. The cross-validation results showed its effectiveness in identifying ACPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.