ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2021
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of an eGlycemic Management System in a Community Hospital Setting.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic Glycemic Management Systems Versus Conventional Insulin Infusion Protocols in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Non-Randomized Studies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Algorithm-guided insulin therapy in hospitalized patients: current evidence, implementation challenges, and future perspectives.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlucommander is an eGlycemic management system (eGMS) for intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SQ) insulin therapy in hospitalized patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Glucommander compared to previously utilized nomograms in the community hospital setting.
methodsThis study was a retrospective, single-center cohort study comparing measures of efficacy and safety of IV and SQ insulin therapy via eGMS versus nomogram-driven IV insulin therapy followed by provider-ordered basal-bolus SQ insulin. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent of blood glucose (BG) readings per patient in target glycemic range. Safety objectives were percent of hyperglycemic events, hypoglycemic events, and severe hypoglycemic events after achieving target blood glucose range, and mean number of each event per patient.
resultsThe percentage of BG readings in range was significantly higher for eGMS patients (
conclusionsOur study found that Glucommander maintained a higher percentage of BG readings in target BG range per patient compared to previously utilized nomograms. This result was driven by an improvement in hyperglycemia, but not hypoglycemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.