ArticleBiology2020
Difference between Selenite and Selenate in the Regulation of Growth and Physiological Parameters of Nickel-Exposed Lettuce.
Article in Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phytotoxicity and metal mobility in soils contaminated with mine tailings.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2026Article
- A Cryopreservation and Regeneration Protocol for Embryogenic Callus ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Phytochemical Profile, Bioactive Properties, and Se Speciation of Se-Biofortified Red Radish (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024Article
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve selenium uptake by modulating root transcriptome of rice (Oryza sativa L.).Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Antioxidant potential and essential oil properties of Hypericum perforatum L. assessed by application of selenite and nano-selenium.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Selenium Supplementation and Crop Plant Tolerance to Metal/Metalloid Toxicity.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nickel is an essential plant micronutrient; however, even at low concentrations, it may be phytotoxic. Selenium is a beneficial element with an alleviating effect that has been confirmed in the case of many abiotic stresses, including metal toxicity. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of two forms of Se (Se(IV) or Se(VI)) on the phytotoxicity, accumulation, and translocation of Ni in lettuce. Nickel causes a reduction in lettuce growth and vitality of roots, probably through increased lipid peroxidation. The application of Se(IV) to a Ni-contaminated medium resulted in a further reduction of growth, especially in the presence of 6 µM Se(IV). The growth-promoting effect of Se was found only in the 2 µM Se(VI)/10 µM Ni treatment. The application of 6 µM Se, regardless of the Se form, to the Ni-containing substrate caused an increase in shoot Ni concentration. In turn, a decrease in root Ni content was found for all Se treatments. The strong aggravation of Ni phytotoxicity in the presence of 6 µM Se(IV) was most likely related to the accumulation of high Se concentration in the roots, and the combination of high root Ni accumulation caused irreversible dysregulation of cell metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.