Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33322666›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Application of Geostatistical Analysis and Random Forest for Source Analysis and Human Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in Arable Land Soil.

Liang Xiao, Yong Zhou, He Huang, Yu-Jie Liu, Ke Li, Meng-Yao Li, Yang Tian, Fei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pollution Risk Prediction for Cadmium in Soil from an Abandoned Mine Based on Random Forest Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liang XiaoFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Yong ZhouFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
He HuangFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Yu-Jie LiuFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Ke LiFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Meng-Yao LiFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Yang TianFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Fei WuFaculty of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arable land soil is one of the most precious natural resources of Earth, it provides the fundamental material and numerous resources essential for the development of human society. To determine the pollution of potential toxic factors in the surface soil of cultivated land and its risks to human health, concentrations of five different potentially toxic elements (PTEs) were detected in 1109 soil samples collected in Xiangzhou, China, in 2019. In this study, health risk assessment was used to judge the degree of pollution in the study area, the result of Geographic Information System (GIS) was as used to research the spatial distribution characteristics of PTEs, and random forest (RF) was used to assess the natural and man-made influencing factors. We investigated the sources of PTEs through quantifying the indicators, which gave further insights. The main results are: (1) In arable land soil, the average content of PTEs is 0.14 mg/kg cadmium (Cd), 0.05 mg/kg mercury (Hg), 12.89 mg/kg arsenic (As), 29.23 mg/kg lead (Pb), and 78.58 mg/kg chromium (Cr), respectively. The content of As and Pb outpaced the background value of Hubei soil. (2) The human health risk assessment in Xiangzhou indicates that the most important exposure pathway is soil ingestion, occupied about 99% to health risks of PTEs; non-carcinogenic risk from exposure to As, Pb and Cr in soil was higher than the limit (overall potential risk index, HI > 1) for both children and adults. Moreover, carcinogenic risk postured by Cd, Cr, and As was higher than the limit (10

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsAdultChildChinaEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRisk AssessmentSoilMetals, HeavySoilSoil Pollutantsarable landChinaGIShuman health risk assessmentrandom forestsource analysis

Identifiers

PMID33322666
PMCPMC7763655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.